Diagnosis and Treatment Strategy of Achalasia Subtypes and Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction Based on High-Resolution Manometry

Ihara, Eikichi; Muta, Kazumasa; Fukaura, Keita; Nakamura, Kazuhiko

doi:10.1159/000452354

Cited by 36 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 20 publications

(32 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the CC v3.0 has helped clarify several issues, especially the varied phenotypes of achalasia, it has also led to the realization that there are circumstances beyond type I, II, and III achalasia in which therapies once reserved for achalasia seem appropriate. In these domains, theories regarding the optimal treatment for each entity are many but evidence remains thin [68][69][70] . Nonetheless, one needs to act on the best evidence available.…”

Section: Poemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes

Kahrilas

Bredenoord

Fox

et al. 2017

Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High-resolution manometry (HRM), along with the analysis algorithms characterized in the Chicago Classification (CC) first proposed in 2008, have led to a major restructuring of the classification of oesophageal motility disorders. The inherently quantitative output of HRM devices fuelled enthusiastic expectation among motility experts that these advances would add a level of precision to the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders that was not previously possible. Nowhere was this advance more evident than in our concept of achalasia, now differentiated into subtypes as a direct result of HRM. Coincident with the assimilation of HRM into clinical practice was the development of a major therapeutic intervention for the management of oesophageal motility disorders, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Not only does the POEM procedure provide a therapeutic option for myotomy with reduced morbidity relative to laparoscopic or open myotomy, but it also enables a calibrated intervention that is customized to patient-specific physiology. Together, these develop ments fostered an increasing emphasis on targeting therapy to specific aspects of oesophageal dysfunction, as measured by physiological testing, rather than discrete diagnoses. Again, nowhere is this evolution more evident than in our strategies for managing achalasia. This Consensus Statement examines the effect of HRM on our current understanding of oesophageal motility disorders with a focus on how this technology has affected the diagnosis, epidemiology and management of achalasia and achalasia-like syndromes. on behalf of the International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and FunctionAbstract | High-resolution manometry (HRM) and new analysis algorithms, summarized in the Chicago Classification, have led to a restructured classification of oesophageal motility disorders. This advance has led to increased detection of clinically relevant disorders, in particular achalasia. It has become apparent that the cardinal feature of achalasia -impaired lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation -can occur in several disease phenotypes: without peristalsis (type I), with pan-oesophageal pressurization (type II), with premature (spastic) distal oesophageal contractions (type III), or with preserved peristalsis (outlet obstruction). Furthermore, no manometric pattern is perfectly sensitive or specific for achalasia caused by a myenteric plexopathy, and there is no biomarker for this pathology. Consequently, physiological testing reveals other syndromes not meeting achalasia criteria that also benefit from therapies formerly reserved for achalasia. These findings have become particularly relevant with the development of a minimally invasive technique for performing a long oesophageal myotomy, the per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Optimal management is to render treatment in a phenotype-specific manner; that is, POEM calibrated to patient-specific physiology for spastic achalasia and the spastic disorders, and more conservative strategies...

show abstract

Section: Poemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes

Kahrilas

Bredenoord

Fox

et al. 2017

Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both achalasia and EGJOO are disorders of EGJ outflow obstruction [21, 27] and EGJOO is considered to be a variant of achalasia [19]. Although there was a case report that showed that EGJOO transformed into type II achalasia, it remains unclear whether EGJOO is an early stage of achalasia or a separate disorder.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mucosally Expressed Cytokines are Associated with the Esophageal Motility Function

Fukaura

Ihara²,

Ogino

et al. 2018

Digestion

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: Although basic research has shown that certain cytokines affect gastrointestinal motility, the clinical evidence is lacking. The objective of this study was to explore the association between mucosally expressed cytokines and the esophageal motility function in humans. Methods: We enrolled a total of 57 patients with suspected esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) who underwent high-resolution manometry. Results: The diagnoses of the patients were as follows: normal esophageal motility (n = 25), ineffective esophageal motility (n = 5), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO; n = 10), distal esophageal spasm (n = 5), achalasia (n = 10), absent contractility (n = 1), and jackhammer esophagus (n = 1). The expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) was significantly higher in EGJOO (14.6, 14.0–15.8, n = 10) than in normal esophageal motility (13.3, 12.8–14.1, n = 25); however, there was no difference in the expression of TNF-α between achalasia (13.4, 13.0–14.1, n = 10) and normal esophageal motility (13.3, 12.8–14.1, n = 25). EGJOO was discriminated from achalasia/normal by a linear discriminant analysis (AUC = 0.917). A multivariable regression analysis revealed that interleukin (IL)-13 and IL-23A were predictive of the distal contractile integral, whereas TNF-α and IL-6 were predictive of the basal EGJ pressure. Conclusions: The esophageal motility was associated with mucosally expressed cytokines in humans; these cytokines could be useful targets for the diagnosis and treatment of EMDs.

show abstract

“…With the advent of the HRM, the Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders was proposed to standardize diagnosis of esophageal dysmotility [10], and diagnostic capability has developed dramatically. Disease pathology is increasingly being determined from the view of esophageal motility, and there are now a number of reports of esophageal motility related to clinical symptoms, proton pump inhibitor-resistant non-erosive reflux disease, and achalasia [11-13]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Esophageal Motility after Extensive Circumferential Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer is sometimes extensive, and in our experience, patients not infrequently present with dysphagia after ESD even in the absence of esophageal stricture. The aim of this study was to evaluate esophageal motility using high-resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with and without dysphagia after extensive circumferential ESD. Methods: HRM was performed in a total of 52 patients who had undergone ESD for superficial esophageal cancer and a mucosal defect after ESD exceeded more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. The frequency and type of esophageal dysmotility and the relationship between esophageal motility and dysphagia were evaluated. Results: Esophageal dysmotility was observed in 13 patients (25%): jackhammer esophagus in 4, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction in 4, absent contractility in 2, and distal esophageal spasm, ineffective esophageal motility, and fragmented peristalsis in 1 patient each. Of the 22 patients with dysphagia after ESD, 9 (41%) had esophageal dysmotility. Of the 30 patients without dysphagia after ESD, 4 (13%) had esophageal dysmotility. The relationship between dysmotility and dysphagia was significant (p = 0.025). Conclusions: Esophageal dysmotility exists in approximately one-quarter of patients after extensive circumferential ESD, which is associated with dysphagia in the absence of esophageal stricture.

show abstract

Diagnosis and Treatment Strategy of Achalasia Subtypes and Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction Based on High-Resolution Manometry

Cited by 36 publications

References 20 publications

Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes

Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes

Mucosally Expressed Cytokines are Associated with the Esophageal Motility Function

Esophageal Motility after Extensive Circumferential Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About