Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Bangalore Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1754288.1754317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of ADHD using SVM algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the training group is 100% while the accuracy of the testing group is 95.83%. The testing accuracy is much higher than the result of J. Anuradha et al [13] which is also classified by SVM [14]. And the comparison result is shown in Fig.4.…”
Section: B Classificationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The accuracy of the training group is 100% while the accuracy of the testing group is 95.83%. The testing accuracy is much higher than the result of J. Anuradha et al [13] which is also classified by SVM [14]. And the comparison result is shown in Fig.4.…”
Section: B Classificationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It is a kind of Pareto optimization problem having set of solutions and no other better alternative solution. They are characterized by trade-offs leading to multitude of Pareto optimal solutions [7]. The Pareto optimal solutions are determined based on the dominant and non-dominant solutions called Pareto front.…”
Section: Multi-objective Psomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, much work has been done on a multi-objective approach for FS in classification using PSO, referred to as MOPSO [22]. This approach uses two-level Pareto front FS algorithms [7,23] namely; non-dominated sorting PSO (NSPSO) and CMDPSO which uses the concepts of crowding, mutation and dominance.…”
Section: Pso In Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important advantage of applying the SVM algorithm is that it can control the complexity of the diagnostic process. This method was tested on children between the ages six to eleven years old and the results indicated a percentage of 88,674% success in diagnosing [14].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%