2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Central-Moment Features From Low- and High-Order Dynamic Resting-State Functional Connectivity Networks

Abstract: The sliding-window-based dynamic functional connectivity networks (D-FCNs) derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) are effective methods for diagnosing various neurological diseases, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, traditional D-FCNs are low-order networks based on pairwise correlation between brain regions, thus overlooking high-level interactions across multiple regions of interest (ROIs). Moreover, D-FCNs suffer from the temporal mismatching issue, i.e.,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the indicators above, we also display the improvement of fusion results compared to the single D-FCN in classification accuracy with the Promote(Lo/Ho) indicator (e.g., 2.4/2.0 represents that the fusion network improved 2.4 compared to Lo-D-FCN and 2.0 compared to Ho-D-FCN in the classification accuracy). Based on Table 3, we derive the following conclusions: (1) the feature fusion result consistently produces better results than features derived from a single network, i.e., the promote indicators are all greater than 0, which is similar to the conclusions of previous studies (Zhao et al, 2020); (2) our UPFFS strategy has better results and greater improvement compared with other strategies, which indicates that our feature selection framework can select more complementary discriminative features from Lo-D-FCN and Ho-D-FCN, thus the SVM classifier has a better learning and generalizability to unseen samples.…”
Section: Classification Performance Based On the Fusion Of Lo-d-fcn Asupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the indicators above, we also display the improvement of fusion results compared to the single D-FCN in classification accuracy with the Promote(Lo/Ho) indicator (e.g., 2.4/2.0 represents that the fusion network improved 2.4 compared to Lo-D-FCN and 2.0 compared to Ho-D-FCN in the classification accuracy). Based on Table 3, we derive the following conclusions: (1) the feature fusion result consistently produces better results than features derived from a single network, i.e., the promote indicators are all greater than 0, which is similar to the conclusions of previous studies (Zhao et al, 2020); (2) our UPFFS strategy has better results and greater improvement compared with other strategies, which indicates that our feature selection framework can select more complementary discriminative features from Lo-D-FCN and Ho-D-FCN, thus the SVM classifier has a better learning and generalizability to unseen samples.…”
Section: Classification Performance Based On the Fusion Of Lo-d-fcn Asupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Feature Extraction. In this experiment, we utilized seven center-distance feature extraction methods for extracting the dynamic variation of FC among multiple ROIs along the scanning time ( Zhao et al, 2020 ). In particular, for Lo-D-FCN, the FC sequence of the i -th and the j -th ROI are defined as ρ i , j = [ρ i , j (1),ρ i , j (2),…,ρ i , j ( K )].…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A generative method refers to describing an object to be tracked in a video through an object-representation method in computer vision and then extracting a corresponding object feature from a current frame containing the object to establish an object template [8][9]. The method then searches the subsequent frames for the area most similar to the object template and gradually iterates to finally achieve the positioning and tracking of the object in the subsequent frames [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. A discriminant method refers to applying both the object template and background information to the tracking system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%