2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection by detection of viral DNA in urine pools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study [14], a pool method for newborn urine specimens was tested with a nested-PCR technique. The aim of that study was to demonstrate that the principle used in blood banking, pool testing [1], could be applied to the diagnosis of HCMV congenital infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study [14], a pool method for newborn urine specimens was tested with a nested-PCR technique. The aim of that study was to demonstrate that the principle used in blood banking, pool testing [1], could be applied to the diagnosis of HCMV congenital infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good example is pooling samples for the detection of blood-borne viruses, which has been used successfully for a decade in transfusion or non-transfusion settings [Allain, 2000;Roth et al, 2002;Mine et al, 2003;Stramer et al, 2004;Seme et al, 2011]. It has been demonstrated recently that urine pools can be used for PCR-based screening of congenital CMV infection without influencing the sensitivity [Paixã o et al, 2005[Paixã o et al, , 2011. Previous studies and our limited experience indicate that median CMV viral loads detected in urine samples from newborns with congenital CMV infection were high enough to allow pooling of at least 24 urine samples without compromising sensitivity [Pass et al, 1983;Boppana et al, 2005;Yan et al, 2008;Cannon et al, 2011].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional virus isolation from urine or saliva is still considered the ''gold standard'' for identification of newborns with congenital CMV infection, but the method is laborious, not amenable to automation and thus unsuitable for large-scale screening [Schleiss, 2008;Syggelou et al, 2010]. Molecular methods, such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are considered currently to be the most appropriate methods for CMV screening of the newborn [Schlesinger et al, 2003;Paixã o et al, 2005;Barbi et al, 2006;Boppana et al, 2010]. However, due to the diverse results obtained in recent major screening studies, the question of which clinical sample saliva, urine or dried blood spots (DBS), is best suited for large-scale neonatal CMV screening is still matter of intense debate [Dollard and Schleiss, 2010;Kharrazi et al, 2010;de Vries et al, 2010;Boppana et al, 2011;Cannon et al, 2011;Leruez-Ville et al, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical clinical symptoms of congenital CMV infection that are found in infected neonates include intrauterine growth retardation, microcephaly with intracranial calcification, hepatosplenomegaly, jaundice, chorioretinitis, thrombocytopenic purpura and anemia [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%