2018
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1494570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of drug causality in non-immediate drug hypersensitivity in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may lead doctors and parents to empirical use of an alternative drug, which could place an extra financial burden on the health insurance system and/or the family, increase antibiotic resistance and ultimately result in ineffective treatment 8 . After a full allergy work‐up, however, less than 10% of these children will be confirmed to have a drug allergy 9 . In a study of 88 children, who were taking BL and presented a non‐immediate exanthema, the majority tested positive for a viral infection, mainly enterovirus and herpes viruses, while they had a negative response to an oral drug provocation test (DPT), and thus, no drug allergy was confirmed 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may lead doctors and parents to empirical use of an alternative drug, which could place an extra financial burden on the health insurance system and/or the family, increase antibiotic resistance and ultimately result in ineffective treatment 8 . After a full allergy work‐up, however, less than 10% of these children will be confirmed to have a drug allergy 9 . In a study of 88 children, who were taking BL and presented a non‐immediate exanthema, the majority tested positive for a viral infection, mainly enterovirus and herpes viruses, while they had a negative response to an oral drug provocation test (DPT), and thus, no drug allergy was confirmed 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%