2007
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-5-47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of drug-induced renal tubular toxicity using global gene expression profiles

Abstract: Toxicogenomics can measure the expression of thousands of genes to identify changes associated with drug induced toxicities. It is expected that toxicogenomics can be an alternative or complementary approach in preclinical drug safety evaluation to identify or predict drug induced toxicities. One of the major concerns in applying toxicogenomics to diagnose or predict drug induced organ toxicity, is how generalizable the statistical classification model is when derived from small datasets? Here we presented tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a separate study that assessed the expression profiling endpoints in parallel with the histopathological diagnosis of concurrent renal tubular toxicity, the performance was improved and a sensitivity of 82% was achieved with 100% of selectivity (Thukral et al, 2005). Furthermore, Jiang et al (2007) achieved a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 91% using the expression profiling endpoints in parallel with the histopathological diagnosis of concurrent renal tubular toxicity. It is thought that concurrent diagnosis is easier than the prediction of future onset because the early stage toxic gene expression changes are heterogenic between different compounds, but the gene expression changes concurrent with the same toxic endpoints are comparatively homogenous among different compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In a separate study that assessed the expression profiling endpoints in parallel with the histopathological diagnosis of concurrent renal tubular toxicity, the performance was improved and a sensitivity of 82% was achieved with 100% of selectivity (Thukral et al, 2005). Furthermore, Jiang et al (2007) achieved a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 91% using the expression profiling endpoints in parallel with the histopathological diagnosis of concurrent renal tubular toxicity. It is thought that concurrent diagnosis is easier than the prediction of future onset because the early stage toxic gene expression changes are heterogenic between different compounds, but the gene expression changes concurrent with the same toxic endpoints are comparatively homogenous among different compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Despite advances in the technologies for measuring protein abundance in recent decades, the experimental techniques for protein identification and quantification still lag considerably behind the highly sensitive methods available for quantifying mRNA transcript levels (45). However, while mRNA expression values are useful in various applications, such as classification, identification, and prediction of drug-induced toxicities or cancers (46,47), the results are correlative rather than causative. It is generally recognized that changes in protein levels, even when subtle (i.e., less than what is deemed statistically significant), may have significant biological effects, and this is currently an area in which analytical techniques with increased sensitivity are required (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of transcriptomic data for characterizing biological effects of small molecules has become increasingly popular since the advent of the Connectivity Map [15]. Several applications ranging from pathway elucidation [16], toxicity models [17,18] and toxicogenomic classifications [19] to tool discovery and drug repurposing [20][21][22][23] have been developed based on drug-induced gene expression profiling [9]. However, whereas these studies certainly have significant scientific value, they do not address the utility of gene expression profiling for decision making during the lead optimization phase of a typical drug discovery project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%