1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9071(199911)59:3<378::aid-jmv19>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of enterovirus and rhinovirus infections by RT-PCR and time-resolved fluorometry with lanthanide chelate labeled probes

Abstract: Detection of enteroviruses and rhinoviruses has traditionally been based on laborious and time-consuming virus isolation. Recently, rapid and sensitive assays for detecting enterovirus and rhinovirus genomic sequences by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) have been introduced. An RT-PCR assay is described that amplifies both enteroviral and rhinoviral sequences, followed by liquid-phase hybridization carried out in a microtiter plate format. In the hybridization assay, amplicons are ident… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RNA was extracted with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RT-PCR was performed using two independent methods: a previously described method amplifying a sequence common to all known enterovirus serotypes (25) and a real-time RT-PCR using the same primers and probes. A sample was considered enterovirus positive if it gave a positive signal in at least one of these assays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA was extracted with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RT-PCR was performed using two independent methods: a previously described method amplifying a sequence common to all known enterovirus serotypes (25) and a real-time RT-PCR using the same primers and probes. A sample was considered enterovirus positive if it gave a positive signal in at least one of these assays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA was extracted from 140 μl serum and from 140 μl rectal swab solution according to the manufacturer's protocol (QIAamp viral RNA kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The presence of enterovirus RNA was detected with RT-PCR using primers specific for the 5′ noncoding region conserved among Picornaviridae and subsequent enterovirus-specific hybridization with lanthanide chelated probes, providing sensitive and specific detection of practically all known enterovirus serotypes (25). All samples with a RT-PCR signal five-fold or higher than a negative control were tested two more times, and a sample was interpreted as positive if at least two out of the three tests were five-fold or higher than the negative control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening for enterovirus RNA was done by RT-PCR followed by hybridization of PCR amplicons using an enterovirus-specific probe. The detection limit for the method is <0.015 fg RNA, which is equivalent to fewer than four copies of enteroviral RNA genome (15). All RNA-positive samples were retested twice, and a result of at least two positive tests out of three tests was interpreted as a positive sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%