2008
DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-4-53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of foot-and mouth disease by real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction under field conditions in Brazil

Abstract: Background: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an economically important and highly contagious viral disease that affects cloven-hoofed domestic and wild animals. Virus isolation and enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are the gold standard tests for diagnosis of FMD. As these methods are time consuming, assays based on viral nucleic acid amplification have been developed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Ag‐LFDs have only been validated for use with epithelial suspension and vesicular fluid, and limited analytical sensitivity restricts their usefulness to the acute stage of infection (Ferris et al., , ). As a consequence, attempts to transfer highly sensitive rRT‐PCR assays onto portable detection platforms have been investigated (Hearps et al., ; Howson et al., ; Madi et al., ; Monwina et al., ; Paixão et al., ), but are either not commercially available or are only suitable for research purposes (i.e., not diagnostic use). This study evaluates the performance of a commercially available, lyophilized FMDV pan‐serotype‐specific assay, in combination with a commercially available portable thermocycler, in laboratory and East African field settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Ag‐LFDs have only been validated for use with epithelial suspension and vesicular fluid, and limited analytical sensitivity restricts their usefulness to the acute stage of infection (Ferris et al., , ). As a consequence, attempts to transfer highly sensitive rRT‐PCR assays onto portable detection platforms have been investigated (Hearps et al., ; Howson et al., ; Madi et al., ; Monwina et al., ; Paixão et al., ), but are either not commercially available or are only suitable for research purposes (i.e., not diagnostic use). This study evaluates the performance of a commercially available, lyophilized FMDV pan‐serotype‐specific assay, in combination with a commercially available portable thermocycler, in laboratory and East African field settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compatibility of an OIE-recommended rRT-PCR assay with POCT platforms has already been demonstrated (Hearps, Zhang, & Alexandersen, 2002;Madi et al, 2012;Monwina, Clavijo, Li, Collignon, & Kitching, 2007;Paixão et al, 2008). For instance, portable rRT-PCR has been deployed in field settings for accurate detection of FMDV in serum, epithelial suspensions and oesophageal-pharyngeal fluid (OP) fluid (Howson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epithelial tissues, vesicular fluid or oro‐pharyngeal fluid are routinely used for diagnosis of FMD and virus typing (OIE, ). However, oral swab samples from clinically suspect cases and apparently healthy animals have also been used for isolation of FMDV and virus typing using conventional RT‐PCR (Callens et al., ) or FMD diagnosis and virus typing using real‐time RT‐PCR (Paixao et al., ; Jamal et al., ; Jamal and Belsham, ). All the 35 original samples tested negative in ELISA but 31 of them tested positive in pan‐FMDV diagnostic 3D rRT‐PCR assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, success of these tests entirely depends on sample quality determined by timing and handling of samples [1], and a number of outbreaks in the region were not serotyped and/or characterised. All but one of the 13 NRLs relied on antibody ELISAs, most likely because these tests are cheap and suitable for working on many samples, require lower level of biocontainment [22], and neither depend on cell cultures nor on highly sensitive, expensive and service-requiring PCR-equipment [31]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phasing out of the CFT in the region demonstrates a move towards more modern methods, which is also evident from the five NRLs already using or introducing PCR. Only three NRLs used VI despite this being about as sensitive as PCR [31,46], most likely for the same reasons as for not using VNT. Equally few NRLs (3) used real time and/or conventional RT-PCR in routine diagnosis, which accords with findings in another endemic country, Brazil, where limited use was attributed to lack of infrastructure, high cost and anticipated problems of maintaining technically complicated and service-demanding PCR machines [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%