2007
DOI: 10.3109/9781420017182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Fungal Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(239 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with current clinical practice, as well as a previous IAD study . Diagnosis of superficial fungal infection relies more heavily on clinical findings and less on laboratory support . Pressure injuries are a localised injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with current clinical practice, as well as a previous IAD study . Diagnosis of superficial fungal infection relies more heavily on clinical findings and less on laboratory support . Pressure injuries are a localised injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…According to Professor Jack Sobel (personal email, jsobel@med.wayne.edu, 3 April 2014), the fungal rash may also present as non‐specific, confluent and papular, creating some difficulty in clinical diagnosis. The presence of a secondary fungal infection would require treatment, but it is desirable to obtain a microbiological culture prior to commencing anti‐mycotic therapy Accordingly, the presence of a secondary fungal infection may have been under‐ or over‐estimated in our study. Our data showed that 32% (12/38) of patients with IAD demonstrated clinical evidence of a fungal infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Despite many efforts to develop detection methods, the diagnosis of IA still remains challenging and current conventional methods are limited for adequate diagnosis (5). Several reasons are responsible for these limitations, such as non-specific and variable clinical symptoms that occur late in the course of disease, considerable delay in turn-around time due to slow growth of the fungus in culture, the time needed for its identification, and especially, a lack of diagnostic methods with sufficient sensitivity and specificity (6). Because of the limitations of the aforementioned diagnostic methods, non-culture methods based on the detection of the molecular biomarkers have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%