1981
DOI: 10.1136/sti.57.4.232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of neurosyphilis by examination of the cerebrospinal fluid.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, carrying out a LUMBAR PUNCTURE among patients who were selected in accordance with the criteria laid out above, in the Material and Methods section, seems to have been appropriate, given that this allowed us to detect five patients (15%) who had positive CSF VDRL tests (which therefore confirmed the diagnosis of neurosyphilis). If we add the criteria set forth by Luger et al 11,12 , this percentage increases to 43.8% (14 patients).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, carrying out a LUMBAR PUNCTURE among patients who were selected in accordance with the criteria laid out above, in the Material and Methods section, seems to have been appropriate, given that this allowed us to detect five patients (15%) who had positive CSF VDRL tests (which therefore confirmed the diagnosis of neurosyphilis). If we add the criteria set forth by Luger et al 11,12 , this percentage increases to 43.8% (14 patients).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On Reibergrams, this can be seen to be connected with intrathecal production of specific antibodies (IgG quotient), which would indicate local activity, while the IgG index itself might have less sensitivity in this regard 12,13,14,15,16 . These diagnostic alternatives have made it possible to obtain information in cases of symptomatic HIV-negative patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, cerebrospinal leukocytosis and elevated protein concentration are nonspecific findings and therefore considered as presumptive diagnosis (18,21). Some authors suggest that both the fluorescent treponemal antibody test (FTAAbs) and the T. pallidum microhemagglutination test (MHA-TP) are more sensitive, although less specific than the VDRL test (21)(22)(23) in the diagnosis of neurosyphilis, but this is not accepted by everyone (24,25). It is also believed that a nonreactive result in the FTA-Abs CSF test (21,23,26) could be used to rule out neurosyphilis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[otherwise undiagnosed] progressive neurologic symptoms." The CSF FTA-ABS yields many false positives unless it is titered and compared to total CSF protein [8], and it is not regarded as acceptable for diagnosing neurosyphilis [9]. The same applies to the microhemagglutination assay for T. pallidum antibodies or other specific anti-treponemal antibody tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%