Fruit Crops 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818732-6.00012-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of nutrient composition in fruit crops: Major developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is informative if AUC lies between 0.7 and 0.9 [69]. Classification accuracy (CA) computed as (TN + TP)/(TN + FN + TP + FP) was compared to the CA of other crops [70]. Nutrient ranges were assessed as the quartile concentration values of TN specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is informative if AUC lies between 0.7 and 0.9 [69]. Classification accuracy (CA) computed as (TN + TP)/(TN + FN + TP + FP) was compared to the CA of other crops [70]. Nutrient ranges were assessed as the quartile concentration values of TN specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUC of the RF model that included features available in the data set was 0.78, indicating that the model was informative. The accuracy of the RF classification model was 0.72 compared to more than 0.80 for most tested crops [ 48 ]. Raw concentrations with no need to impute missing values returned higher model accuracy than log ratios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locally or regionally developed norms produce a higher degree of precision because many factors related with yield or date quality may change: cultivar, rootstock, climate, soil, and crop management [15,16,39]. Although it has been criticized [40,41], the CVA approach remains the most commonly used to diagnose foliar status. Table 1 is useful for advisory services for the quantitative diagnosis of palms.…”
Section: Critical Value Approach (Cva)mentioning
confidence: 99%