2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of paratuberculosis in a dairy herd native to Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Dogs with gastrointestinal disease were not significantly more likely to be M. paratuberculosis positive (OR 7.14, 95%CI 0.39 -132.13) compared to control dogs (Glanemann et al, 2008). Prevalence of M. paratuberculosis in suspect Johne's disease dairy cattle by fecal culture was reported to be 50% in Egypt and 41% by culture or 32% by ELISA in Brazil (Salem et al, 2005;Ristow et al, 2007). Meta-analysis of results from buffalo suspected of Johne's disease in Pakistan and India were M. paratuberculosis positive in 12% of cases (95%CI 11-15, I 2 0%) by PCR, 5% (2-10, I 2 0%) by ELISA and 7% (0-27, I 2 99%) by visual confirmation (Sivakumar et al, 2006;Khan et al, 2010;Sikandar et al, 2012).…”
Section: Paratuberculosis Infection In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dogs with gastrointestinal disease were not significantly more likely to be M. paratuberculosis positive (OR 7.14, 95%CI 0.39 -132.13) compared to control dogs (Glanemann et al, 2008). Prevalence of M. paratuberculosis in suspect Johne's disease dairy cattle by fecal culture was reported to be 50% in Egypt and 41% by culture or 32% by ELISA in Brazil (Salem et al, 2005;Ristow et al, 2007). Meta-analysis of results from buffalo suspected of Johne's disease in Pakistan and India were M. paratuberculosis positive in 12% of cases (95%CI 11-15, I 2 0%) by PCR, 5% (2-10, I 2 0%) by ELISA and 7% (0-27, I 2 99%) by visual confirmation (Sivakumar et al, 2006;Khan et al, 2010;Sikandar et al, 2012).…”
Section: Paratuberculosis Infection In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nos casos descritos da enfermidade no Brasil, em geral, estão relatados os achados clínico-patológicos e aspectos do diagnóstico laboratorial, porém, as informações epidemiológicas não estão detalhadamente apresentadas. A partir das informações disponíveis, nota-se que bovinos leiteiros são os mais afetados; há descrições nesta espécie nas cinco regiões do país: na região nordeste, nos estados de Pernambuco (Mota et al 2007) e Paraíba (Oliveira et al 2008, Mota et al 2009); na região sudeste nos estados do Rio de Janeiro (Dupont 1915, Santos e Silva 1956, Dacorso et al 1960, Silva & Pizelli 1961, Ferreira et al 2003, Ristow et al 2007, São Paulo (Fonseca et al 2000) e Minas Gerais (Nakajima et al 1991, Carvalho 2008; na região Sul, em Santa Catarina (Portugal et al 1979), Rio Grande do Sul (Ramos et al 1986, Driemeier et al 1999, Gomes et al 2002; na região centroeste, nos estados de Mato Grosso do Sul (Riveira 1996) e Goiás (Cunha et al 2003, Acypreste et al 2005 e na região norte, no estado do Pará (Silva 2005). Na espé-cie bubalina, apesar de ser considerado menos susceptível à infecção pelo Map em relação aos bovinos (Sivakumar et al 2006), foram relatados, até o momento, casos clínicos de paratuberculose em duas regiões do país; o primeiro caso foi descrito na região nordeste, estado de Pernambuco por Mota et al (2010), em seguida por Barbosa et al (2010) no estado de Maranhão.…”
Section: Epidemiologiaunclassified
“…No Brasil, estudos realizados nos últimos 97 anos, demonstraram que a enfermidade está presente em várias regiões do país: Dupont 1915, Santos & Silva 1956, Dacorso Filho et al 1960, Silva & Pizelli 1961, Portugal et al 1979, Riveira 1996, Driemeier et al 1999, Fonseca et al 2000, Ferreira et al 2001, Gomes et al 2002, Acypreste et al 2005, Mota et al 2007, Ristow et al 2007, Dib et al 2008, Mota et al 2010, Dalto et al 2012, entre outros (Quadro 1) e os prejuízos econômicos associados com Map estão provavelmente subestimados. Nota--se a crescente importância da paratuberculose no Brasil não só em bovinos, mas também em bubalinos (Barbosa et al 2010, Mota et al 2010, Dalto et al 2012, ovinos e caprinos (Jacintho et al 2009, Medeiros et al 2012a.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Category 1 comprised sera of infected animals and was used to determine the sensitivity of the test. This category comprised Group A, which included 12 sera from animals with confirmed diagnosis trough positive fecal culture and/or histhopatological findings but none of them were tested by serological assays; eight of (12). The Group B comprising sera from 14 asymptomatic animals serologically positive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Category 2 consisted of sera from uninfected animals and was used to determine the specificity of the test. This category was composed of Group C, which included sera of 40 asymptomatic animals from infected herds with negative fecal culture (12) and Group D, which included sera from 42 animals from herds PTBfree and non-reactive in the same three ELISAs used to characterize Group B.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%