1995
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis in transplanted kidneys: value of Doppler waveform analysis of the intrarenal arteries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DU, although most readily available and inexpensive, does require considerable operator skill in imaging the origins of the renal arteries where TRAS commonly occurs (14,15). A peak Doppler velocity exceeding 200 cm/s with color aliasing at the site of stenosis with renal to external iliac artery peak velocity ratio exceeding 2 are good indicators of the presence of stenosis (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DU, although most readily available and inexpensive, does require considerable operator skill in imaging the origins of the renal arteries where TRAS commonly occurs (14,15). A peak Doppler velocity exceeding 200 cm/s with color aliasing at the site of stenosis with renal to external iliac artery peak velocity ratio exceeding 2 are good indicators of the presence of stenosis (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median time in months from transplantation to diagnosis of TRAS was Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis 4.1 (range 1. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Upon presentation, all 12 patients were hypertensive and had allograft dysfunction, more than half (7/12) had dependent edema, and a quarter had a bruit on auscultation.…”
Section: Clinical Presentation Of Trasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first studies regarded a blood flow velocity of 100 cm/s as the upper limit, while later research suggested the limit should be 170 -200 cm/s. In these studies sensitivity was 81% -92% and specificity was 87% -96% (Gottlieb et al, 1995;House et al, 1999;Krumme et al, 1996;Miralles et al, 1996). However, the renalaortic ratio obtained by dividing the renal artery flow velocity by the abdominal aorta flow velocity can be used to eliminate individual differences.…”
Section: Renal Artery Stenosis and Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of variation in waveform morphology between donors and recipients confirmed the restoration of a regular low-resistance flow pattern of a normal kidney [20,21]. CDUS evaluation of the intraparenchymal renal resistance is useful alongside the monitoring of biochemical parameters in the follow-up of normally functioning allografts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%