2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of the Pathology of the Kanam Mandible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fossil is generally thought to derive from the Lower or Middle Pleistocene, and expresses pathological growth in the symphysial region. The lesion has been attributed to osteosarcoma, bone keloid, or Burkitt's lymphoma, although some researchers have diagnosed it as osteomyelitis resulting from a facial fracture [49][50][51][52] . The first substantive evidence for malignant neoplasia in hominins is derived from the SK7923 metatarsal fragment, dated to 1.8 to 1.6 Ma, from the site of Swartkrans, South Africa; a bony cortical exostosis together with osseous infilling of the medullary cavity of the shaft of the bone has been attributed by Odes and colleagues to osteosarcoma 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fossil is generally thought to derive from the Lower or Middle Pleistocene, and expresses pathological growth in the symphysial region. The lesion has been attributed to osteosarcoma, bone keloid, or Burkitt's lymphoma, although some researchers have diagnosed it as osteomyelitis resulting from a facial fracture [49][50][51][52] . The first substantive evidence for malignant neoplasia in hominins is derived from the SK7923 metatarsal fragment, dated to 1.8 to 1.6 Ma, from the site of Swartkrans, South Africa; a bony cortical exostosis together with osseous infilling of the medullary cavity of the shaft of the bone has been attributed by Odes and colleagues to osteosarcoma 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly all palaeopathological examples of cancer only dates to the past 500 years of human history, and evidence for cancer before the modern era is indeed rare (Binder, Roberts, Spencer, Antoine, & Cartwright, ). Early confirmation of neoplastic disease is however indicated by a lesion on an archaic Homo mandible from Kanam, Kenya (Phelan et al., ), and a fibrous dysplasia on a Neanderthal rib dated to 120 ka from the site of Krapina, Croatia (Monge et al., ). The recent discovery of neoplastic tumours in members of Australopithecus and early Homo (Odes et al., ; Randolph‐Quinney et al., ) dated to 1.98 and c .…”
Section: Ancient Human Health and Oncogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronological incidence of prehistoric oncogenic tumours and important milestones concerning cancer aetiology and treatment (Binder et al., ; Bona et al., ; Monge et al., ; Odes et al., ; Phelan et al., ; Randolph‐Quinney et al., ) (‘Rom.’ and ‘Med.’ referes to Roman and Medieval Periods, respectively).…”
Section: Ancient Human Health and Oncogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altered or affected bones in skeletal remains might provide information about certain diseases, such as cancers [ 1 , 2 ] and rheumatic diseases [ 3 ]. A lesion on an archaic Homo mandible from Kanam, Kenya (Middle to Late Pleistocene) [ 4 ] and a fibrous dysplasia on a Neanderthal rib (older than 120000 years) from the site of Krapina, Croatia [ 5 ] are early confirmation of neoplastic disease. Neoplastic tumors have however been detected in early Homo samples as old as 1.7 million years ago, and these provide further insight into the outset of human cancers [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%