2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-018-0133-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic ability of limited volume cone beam computed tomography with small voxel size in identifying the superior and inferior walls of the mandibular canal

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the visibility of the superior and inferior walls of the mandibular canal separately using limited volume cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with small voxel size.MethodsCBCT cross-sectional images of 86 patients obtained by 3D Accuitomo FPD and reconstructed with a voxel size of 0.08 mm were used for the evaluation. A 30-mm range of the mandible just distal to the mental foramen was divided into three equal areas (areas 1, 2, and 3, from anterior to posterior)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of MC has been controversial owing to lack of longitudinal studies [22,23]. Visualization is the first step in MC assessment, and it highly depends on cortication status of MC wall [32]. In present study, not all the MC walls can be measured because walls are often not visible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The structure of MC has been controversial owing to lack of longitudinal studies [22,23]. Visualization is the first step in MC assessment, and it highly depends on cortication status of MC wall [32]. In present study, not all the MC walls can be measured because walls are often not visible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…En acuerdo con esta premisa Shokri et al describieron que el canal mandibular aparece como una zona radiolúcida rodeada por un márgen superior e inferior radiopaco en las imágenes, cuya corticalización es diversa, haciendo que la definición de dichos márgenes no sea una característica constante y regular. De hecho en el 56,3 % de los casos es posible distinguir las corticales, y en el 43,7 % no fue posible identificar de forma concreta estos detalles Ishii et al (2018),. señalaron que cortical superior reviste mayor importancia, porque junto con la cortical alveolar son importantes a la hora de colocar implantes.…”
unclassified