2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09474-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of automated ACR BI-RADS breast density classification using deep convolutional neural networks

Abstract: Objectives High breast density is a well-known risk factor for breast cancer. This study aimed to develop and adapt two (MLO, CC) deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) for automatic breast density classification on synthetic 2D tomosynthesis reconstructions. Methods In total, 4605 synthetic 2D images (1665 patients, age: 57 ± 37 years) were labeled according to the ACR (American College of Radiology) density (A-D). Two DCNNs with 11 convolutional layer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same pattern was also observed among radiologists and in other studies. 27,35 The primary cause of this disparity was the distribution of BI-RADS densities, which were almost equal in dense and non-dense, but highly imbalanced between the four categories. The limited training data also restricted the classifier's capabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same pattern was also observed among radiologists and in other studies. 27,35 The primary cause of this disparity was the distribution of BI-RADS densities, which were almost equal in dense and non-dense, but highly imbalanced between the four categories. The limited training data also restricted the classifier's capabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other models have also demonstrated high levels of agreement in clinical use in the binary categorization of dense and non-dense breasts, with 94% agreement amongst radiologists with a DL algorithm when evaluating more than 10,000 mammography examinations [40]. Diagnostic accuracy can be maintained in algorithms assessing breast density in synthetic mammograms, demonstrating an accuracy of 89.6% when differentiating dense and non-dense breasts [41]. However, the possibility for altered performance of automated breast density assessments exists when moving from FFDM images to synthetic mammography, including complex potential interactions with ethnicity and body mass index that require awareness and attention [42].…”
Section: Breast Densitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Breast density cannot be detected through physical examination but only through mammography, and it is an important variable that affects the sensitivity of mammography [3][4][5][6]. Over 40% of women with dense breast tissue are characterized as heterogeneously dense (ACR-C) or extremely dense (ACR-D).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its impact on the accurate detection of cancer in mammograms, the problem of automatic breast tissue recognition has been extensively studied over the last decade, with a large number of papers published in this area proposing systems that use either traditional machine learning techniques or, more recently, deep learning networks and architectures [4][5][6][7]13,15,16]. However, to our knowledge, none of them proposes a method to "transform" breast density to lower density levels and thus enhance the diagnostic accuracy of CAD systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%