2021
DOI: 10.21037/tcr-21-104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of circulating miR-126 for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: Circulating microRNAs are novel diagnostic markers for various types of cancer. Several studies have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of circulating miR-126 for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), but the results varied. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic value of circulating miR-126 for MPM. Methods:The PubMed database was searched to identify potentially eligible studies published before October 2020. The studies investigating the dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, numerous cell-free miRNAs have been identified as non-invasive biomarkers for MPM, but only miR-126, miR-132-3p, and miR-103a-3p were tested in plasma of preclinical MPM samples, showing that this miRNA pattern was not feasible to detect MPM at early stages [31][32][33][34][35]. Indeed, we did not find any difference in expression levels for the three described miRNAs as reported in Supplementary Table S4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…So far, numerous cell-free miRNAs have been identified as non-invasive biomarkers for MPM, but only miR-126, miR-132-3p, and miR-103a-3p were tested in plasma of preclinical MPM samples, showing that this miRNA pattern was not feasible to detect MPM at early stages [31][32][33][34][35]. Indeed, we did not find any difference in expression levels for the three described miRNAs as reported in Supplementary Table S4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…By using microRNA array or public databases, some microRNAs with potential diagnostic significance have been identified. Specifically, mir-126 36,37 , miR-103a-3p 38,39 and mir-2053 40 represent the most promising candidates for a MPM diagnosis. However, their diagnostic accuracy, assessed with the ROC curve, is still moderate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the best accuracy is found when compared with healthy controls without asbestos exposure [25]. When compared with healthy individuals with and without asbestos exposure, it shows a poor diagnostic value, with pooled sensitivity and specificity for PM of 71% and 69%, respectively (AUC ROC 0.74) [91].…”
Section: Micrornas (Mirnas) and Long Non-coding Rnas (Lncrnas)mentioning
confidence: 99%