2018
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy of Exercise Electrocardiogram in Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As aforementioned, non-invasive functional tests able to allow detection of perfusion abnormalities or wall motion abnormalities under stress were identified as more accurate in CCS than s-ECG, which downgraded it to a lower level of recommendation because of its poor accuracy in detecting CAD, especially in females and in patients with resting ECG abnormalities [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: The Role Of Multimodality Imaging In Identifying Patients Wo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As aforementioned, non-invasive functional tests able to allow detection of perfusion abnormalities or wall motion abnormalities under stress were identified as more accurate in CCS than s-ECG, which downgraded it to a lower level of recommendation because of its poor accuracy in detecting CAD, especially in females and in patients with resting ECG abnormalities [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: The Role Of Multimodality Imaging In Identifying Patients Wo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, non-invasive assessment of suspected CAD has relied on functional techniques. One of the most prescribed functional tests is exercise electrocardiography (Ex-ECG) due to its wide availability and simple reporting [10]; however, overall diagnostic accuracy has been proven to be limited for the detection of obstructive CAD [11], especially in specific settings such as female gender [12] and ECG resting abnormalities [13]. In light of the poor overall diagnostic performance, this approach has formally been downgraded to a lower level of recommendation [6].…”
Section: Last Updates Regarding Available Second-line Non-invasive Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%