2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for identification of elevated left ventricular filling pressure

Abstract: Aims: The current algorithm in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) proposed in the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendation for the estimation of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is quite complex and time-consuming. B-lines, in lung ultrasonography (LUS), could constitute an interesting tool for LVFP evaluation in clinical practice, although data regarding their association with invasive haemodynamics are lacking. The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic accuracy of B-lines in identifying elevated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 In addition, LUS has demonstrated substantial correlation with cardiac catheterization-derived LV end-diastolic pressure, making it a valuable adjunct to echocardiography and clinical variables in the management of heart failure patients. 19 Prognostic significance LUS-detected pulmonary congestion is associated with adverse outcomes even in asymptomatic patients. For instance, in a multi-center observational study including 392 ESKD patients on hemodialysis, those with very severe congestion (> 60 B-lines on a 28-zone scan) had a 4.2-fold risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 4.20; 95% confidence interval, 2.45-7.23) and a 3.2-fold risk of cardiac events (HR 3.20; 95% CI,1.75-5.88) after adjusting for heart failure class and other risk factors compared with those having mild or no congestion (<15 B-lines).…”
Section: Diagnostic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In addition, LUS has demonstrated substantial correlation with cardiac catheterization-derived LV end-diastolic pressure, making it a valuable adjunct to echocardiography and clinical variables in the management of heart failure patients. 19 Prognostic significance LUS-detected pulmonary congestion is associated with adverse outcomes even in asymptomatic patients. For instance, in a multi-center observational study including 392 ESKD patients on hemodialysis, those with very severe congestion (> 60 B-lines on a 28-zone scan) had a 4.2-fold risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 4.20; 95% confidence interval, 2.45-7.23) and a 3.2-fold risk of cardiac events (HR 3.20; 95% CI,1.75-5.88) after adjusting for heart failure class and other risk factors compared with those having mild or no congestion (<15 B-lines).…”
Section: Diagnostic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used a simplified technique using eight scanning zones, similar to the study of Platz et al in ambulatory patients. 16 Previous studies have evaluated B-line cut-off between three and eight, 11,16 with three being used in eight zone techniques and eight in 28 zone techniques. The finding of 0.3 B-line or more per scanning site does appear as a reliable threshold to identify high-risk ambulatory HF patients.…”
Section: B-lines Evaluation: a Very Small Number But Still Providing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hubert and colleagues performed direct measurements of LV filling pressure and B-lines assessment on patients with different cardiovascular conditions, undergoing coronary angiography, and found that the total number of B-lines was significantly higher in the elevated LVEDP group (≥20 mmHg). They underline that the diagnostic capacity of B-lines to identify elevated LVEDP is higher than that of classical echocardiographic strategies ( Hubert et al, 2019 ). Volpicelli et al also assessed B-lines in critically ill patients with simultaneous PCWP monitoring (with only 10 patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema), confirming that B-lines allow good prediction of pulmonary congestion indicated by EVLW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%