2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2005.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
57
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the negative findings on MRCP might not completely exclude early-stage SC, because MRCP is considered by some authors of lower sensitivity than ERCP for the diagnosis of proximal bile duct lesions, even if this has not been clearly demonstrated in the field of PSC. 25,26 Bilaj et al 27 have recently documented the MRI appearance of AIH, and this report is consistent with our data. The authors observed mild IHBD dilatation in 12% of AIH patients (4/32 patients).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Conversely, the negative findings on MRCP might not completely exclude early-stage SC, because MRCP is considered by some authors of lower sensitivity than ERCP for the diagnosis of proximal bile duct lesions, even if this has not been clearly demonstrated in the field of PSC. 25,26 Bilaj et al 27 have recently documented the MRI appearance of AIH, and this report is consistent with our data. The authors observed mild IHBD dilatation in 12% of AIH patients (4/32 patients).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Two recent reports compared these two modalities head-to-head. Berstad et al [28] thought that the diagnostic accuracy of ERC and MRC were comparable, despite MRC providing a slightly poorer depiction than ERC of extrahepatic and intrahepatic ducts. They reported independent reader sensitivity and specificity rates of 80% and 87%, with an accuracy of 83% for MRC, compared to 89%, 80% and 85 % for ERC.…”
Section: Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ERCP has been regarded as the standard of reference in diagnosing PSC, MRC is now recommended as first line non-invasive imaging method for patients with suspected PSC, offering comparable accuracy (except in in early stage of PSC restricted into intrahepatic bile ducts and the rare cases of contraindications to MRC) (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). A meta-analysis based on six studies using ERCP as a reference method concluded that MRC has high sensitivity and specificity (0.86 and 0.94, respectively) for the diagnosis of PSC (13).…”
Section: Esge/easl Recommend That As the Primary Diagnostic Modalitymentioning
confidence: 99%