2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01685.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of shoulder ultrasound performed by a single operator

Abstract: Both diagnostic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used for investigation of the presence and severity of rotator cuff lesions. There is no consensus as to which is the more accurate and cost-effective study. We sought to examine the sensitivity of ultrasound, when used by one experienced radiologist with modern equipment. We compared the ultrasound and surgical results obtained from 68 patients. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 100% (Positive Predictive Value 100%) fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…* Patients were ranked by the difference between recalled preoperative and postoperative pain; all but two patients had a clinically significant improvement in pain levels (p = 0.0002) [6]; HHS = Harris hip score; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index. We found ultrasound had a high positive predictive value for gluteal tendon tears documented at surgery in select patients, which is comparable to that reported for shoulder rotator cuff injury [12,33]. The only other study of ultrasound imaging for GTPS did not report the positive predicative value and was not able to report the sensitivity, because like us, they did not have a surgical control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…* Patients were ranked by the difference between recalled preoperative and postoperative pain; all but two patients had a clinically significant improvement in pain levels (p = 0.0002) [6]; HHS = Harris hip score; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index. We found ultrasound had a high positive predictive value for gluteal tendon tears documented at surgery in select patients, which is comparable to that reported for shoulder rotator cuff injury [12,33]. The only other study of ultrasound imaging for GTPS did not report the positive predicative value and was not able to report the sensitivity, because like us, they did not have a surgical control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…14 Ultrasonography provides a readily available, accurate, noninvasive, low-cost, and radiationfree diagnostic assessment of the painful shoulder with the added ability for a real-time dynamic assessments. [15][16][17] In addition, there is strong evidence supporting increased accuracy of ultrasound-guided injections in soft tissues and peripheral joints. 18 Furthermore, USguided percutaneous release surgeries showed promising results in various musculoskeletal disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diagnostic US assessment of all participants was undertaken by an experienced musculoskeletal sonographer. For this study, the diagnostic criteria for RC tendinopathy were derived from a combination of existing published criteria . Tendinopathy was diagnosed when there was loss of the normal fibrillar structure of the tendon, with an abnormally hypoechoic appearance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, the diagnostic criteria for RC tendinopathy were derived from a combination of existing published criteria. [22][23][24] Tendinopathy was diagnosed when there was loss of the normal fibrillar structure of the tendon, with an abnormally hypoechoic appearance. A partialthickness tear was diagnosed when flattening of the bursal side of the tendon or a distinct hypoechoic defect was seen within or on either surface of the tendon.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%