A multiplexed biomarker bundle consisting of nine different inflammation markers was evaluated regarding their diagnostic and prognostic performances in 159 adult systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) patients enrolled at the emergency department. Fibronectin, interleukin-8 (IL-8), biotin, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were the most robust markers but were not superior to the already established markers IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR).
Bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality (1). Early and reliable diagnosis for appropriate treatment is essential for improving the prognosis of infected patients. While so far, no single biomarker was able to replace time-consuming blood cultures, some, like procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), are commonly used for additional assessments (2, 3).Recently, a new CE-marked in vitro diagnostic (IVD)-approved multiplex analysis system (Anagnostics Bioanalysis GmbH, Vienna, Austria) for testing inflammatory biomarkers was introduced to the market, using competitive and sandwich immunoassays. This test system is a fully automated instrument that may provide extended and rapid inflammation monitoring in a single run; the time to result is 3 min per sample, and 8 samples can be measured consecutively in one run.The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic (for positive blood cultures caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, or Candida spp.) and prognostic performances of the biomarker bundle in patients fulfilling the SIRS criteria (all patients had fever and fulfilled one or more additional SIRS criteria) at the emergency department (ED).(This paper was presented in part at the 54th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [ICAAC], 5 to 9 September 2014, Washington, DC [14].)The biomarkers were evaluated in 159 adult patients who were included consecutively at the Medical University of Graz, Austria, between June 2012 and March 2013. All the biomarker levels (routinely tested and multiplexed) and blood culture results originated from blood samples taken when patients presented to the emergency department, before anti-infective treatment was initiated. The additional inclusion criteria were (i) no anti-infective treatment during the 5 days before blood samples were obtained, (ii) informed consent (approved by the ethics committee, Medical University Graz, Austria, no. 21-469 ex 09/10), (iii) positive blood culture results with growth of S. aureus, E. coli, or Candida spp., or negative blood culture results, and (iv) the anticipated limit of about 50 patients in each study group had not been reached. Inclusion criteria (iii) and (iv) were applied only for retrospective testing of the biomarker bundle (see details below).