2017
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of the D-dimer in children

Abstract: D-dimer is currently ordered in children for suspected PE in the emergency care setting, mostly in teenagers. The observed lower limit 95% CIs of 89% and 54% for diagnostic sensitivity and the specificity, respectively, suggest if used in patients with low-clinical probability, a normal D-dimer can safely exclude PE in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was noted that in larger studies, the prevalence of PEs was lower when compared to our study at 35% (28)(29)(30). A study with 1177 patients had a prevalence of 17% [13].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was noted that in larger studies, the prevalence of PEs was lower when compared to our study at 35% (28)(29)(30). A study with 1177 patients had a prevalence of 17% [13].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…A study with 1177 patients had a prevalence of 17% [13]. Perrier et al using a Eur J Respir Med 2021, 3:2 cut off value of 500 μg/L for D-dimer, obtained sensitivities of 99.5% and specificity of 41% (NPV 99%) [28,30]. We obtained similar values using 450 μg/L with marginally lower sensitivity (96%) but much better specificity (53%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Although not sensitive, ECG may show unspecific alterations suggestive of PE, 28 as sinus tachycardia, an alarm sign present in most of our cases. d ‐dimer testing was reported to lack utility in the diagnosis of childhood PE 14 but, in a recent multicentric study, 29 displayed a 100% sensitivity. In our data, d ‐dimer were positive in all acute PE, and negative only in a subacute PE in an anticoagulated patient and an asymptomatic PE, also antiaggregated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in results may be related to the characteristics of patients included in the studies. Another pediatric study that retrospectively investigated the discriminative ability of D‐dimer levels in children with and without PE using high sensitivity and intermediate specificity assays showed D‐dimer levels to have an AUC of 0.90 and high sensitivity (1.00) with moderate specificity (0.58) at a cut‐off of 500 ng/ml FEU 25 . The study allowed a 30 day‐window from D‐dimer testing to pulmonary embolism or DVT diagnosis, so that the results would indicate the prognostic rather than the diagnostic value of D‐dimer levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%