2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) for cases of feline mycobacteriosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted in a relatively high estimated sensitivity and specificity for the lion QFT Mabtech Cat IGRA (87.5% and 100%, respectively) although the 95% CI was wide due to low sample size. The test performance of this IGRA was similar to IGRAs used in the domestic cat (68% sensitivity, 96% specificity), white rhinoceros ( Ceratotherium simum ) (78% sensitivity, 92% specificity), and African buffalo (89% sensitivity, 94% specificity) [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. Therefore, future studies should confirm the diagnostic cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of this IGRA using a larger sample size of lions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This resulted in a relatively high estimated sensitivity and specificity for the lion QFT Mabtech Cat IGRA (87.5% and 100%, respectively) although the 95% CI was wide due to low sample size. The test performance of this IGRA was similar to IGRAs used in the domestic cat (68% sensitivity, 96% specificity), white rhinoceros ( Ceratotherium simum ) (78% sensitivity, 92% specificity), and African buffalo (89% sensitivity, 94% specificity) [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. Therefore, future studies should confirm the diagnostic cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of this IGRA using a larger sample size of lions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…31 This IGRA has been shown to have a sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% and 92.6%, respectively, for detecting NTM infections (updated to 83.3% and 93.3%, respectively, after cut-off adjustments were made in a recent study); however, it cannot differentiate between different NTM species (ie, it cannot specifically detect M avium or even MAC). 31 However, as M avium was confirmed by PCR in the other cat, and as both cats had only one known exposure, the likelihood of the second cat having been exposed to a different NTM is unlikely. The sensitivity and specificity of the IGRA to differentiate the NTM are lower than those reported for MTBC infections; because MAC is a large complex of related infections, it may be this marked heterogeneity, compared with the marked homogeneity of the TB complex, that makes the IGRA less sensitive and specific for this complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of the IGRA to differentiate the NTM are lower than those reported for MTBC infections; because MAC is a large complex of related infections, it may be this marked heterogeneity, compared with the marked homogeneity of the TB complex, that makes the IGRA less sensitive and specific for this complex. 31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also been applied elsewhere (Peterhans et al, 2020). However, concerns regarding the sensitivity of the IGRA have been highlighted, particularly for cases of infection with M. bovis (Mitchell et al, 2021), which is potentially zoonotic. The IGRA also requires live peripheral blood cells, which can sometimes fail to respond to the positive mitogen control, causing a test quality control fail (Mitchell et al, 2021); this could indicate a state of anergy in these cats (Schwartz, 2003) or poor sample viability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%