2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating miR-21 for cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
106
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, circulating miR-21 also shows many advantages compared with histopathological examination, most notably that its detection does not require an invasive or harmful procedure. Wang et al (2014c) also demonstrated that serum miR-21 was a significant independent factor for HCC recurrence, and this measure was also reported to be more sensitive than AFP for the detection of HCC. This observation suggests that serum miRNAs, such as miR-21, might be useful for the prediction of HCC risk and the early detection of HCC (Wang et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, circulating miR-21 also shows many advantages compared with histopathological examination, most notably that its detection does not require an invasive or harmful procedure. Wang et al (2014c) also demonstrated that serum miR-21 was a significant independent factor for HCC recurrence, and this measure was also reported to be more sensitive than AFP for the detection of HCC. This observation suggests that serum miRNAs, such as miR-21, might be useful for the prediction of HCC risk and the early detection of HCC (Wang et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…miRNAs have been proposed to represent ideal biomarker candidates because of their resistance to endogenous RNase resistance and high stability under different storage conditions (Schwarzenbach et al, 2014) and in the peripheral blood (Zhu et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2014c). Abnormal miRNA expression is closely associated with HCC (Tomimaru et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And there have been numerous meta-analyses about miR-21 for cancer detection. In the meta-analysis of Wang et al, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of miR-21 in cancer diagnosis were 75.7% (95%CI: 67.5%-82.65%) and 79.3% (95%CI: 74.2%-83.5%), respectively (Wang et al, 2014). Chan et al have also demonstrated that miR-21 was over-expressed in tissues of 92% patients with gastric cancer (Chan et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same holds true for miR-155 that is not only over-expressed in different malignant tumors but also plays a role in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological conditions such as immunity, inflammation and cardiovascular diseases (more examples of aberrantly regulated cfmiRNAs in more than one organ are summarized in Table 3) [111]. In a recently published meta-analysis, it was demonstrated that cfmiR-21 is not suitable as a diagnostic marker for cancer [124]. This statement does not come as a surprise given the facts that in most studies cancer patients (i) were compared Overexpressed [97] Overexpressed in multiple myeloma [114] 21 Overexpressed in several papers, see Table 2 Overexpressed in: colorectal cancer [115] pancreatic cancer [116] Overexpressed in: hepatitis C patients with/ without hepatocellular Tong squamous cell carcinoma [117] Carcinoma [119] Osteosarcoma [118] Students performing acute exhaustive excercise [120] Gastric cancer [113] 155 Overexpressed in several papers, see Table 2 Overexpressed in: pancreatic cancer [116] Breast cancer [121] 372…”
Section: Mirnamentioning
confidence: 95%