2017
DOI: 10.3233/jad-170073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of the Combination of Two Measures of Verbal Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract: The combination of FCSRT and CERAD-WL improves the classification of MCI-AD and defines different prognostic profiles. These findings have important implications for clinical practice and the design of clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study (IIBSP-BIO-2015-76) was approved by the local ethics committee following the ethical standards recommended by the Helsinki Declaration. All subjects were evaluated by neurologists with expertise in neurodegenerative diseases, by neuropsychologists using a previously published neuropsychological battery (12) and assessed for established AD biomarkers, namely brain amyloidosis (low CSF levels of A␤1-42 or positive amyloid PET imaging) and neurodegeneration (high CSF levels of total tau or phosphorylated tau) based on local cut-offs. These cut-offs have high specificity and sensitivity to distinguish AD dementia patients from controls (13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study (IIBSP-BIO-2015-76) was approved by the local ethics committee following the ethical standards recommended by the Helsinki Declaration. All subjects were evaluated by neurologists with expertise in neurodegenerative diseases, by neuropsychologists using a previously published neuropsychological battery (12) and assessed for established AD biomarkers, namely brain amyloidosis (low CSF levels of A␤1-42 or positive amyloid PET imaging) and neurodegeneration (high CSF levels of total tau or phosphorylated tau) based on local cut-offs. These cut-offs have high specificity and sensitivity to distinguish AD dementia patients from controls (13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitively normal control participants (n = 118) were also included in the present study. All controls had normal cognitive scores in the formal neuropsychological evaluation 23 and normal core CSF AD biomarkers (see 17 for further details of the SPIN cohort).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the test dataset, 907 cognitively normal individuals were selected from eight cohorts of the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer's disease (EMIF-AD) project: Barcelona St. Pau (Alcolea et al, 2014 ; Sala et al, 2017 ), EDAR (Reijs et al, 2017 ), Gipuzkoa Alzheimer Project (GAP) (Estanga et al, 2017 ), Gothenburg MCI study (Wallin et al, 2016 ), IDIBAPS (Fortea et al, 2010 ), IMAP+ (La Joie et al, 2014 ), Leuven (Adamczuk et al, 2015 , 2016a , b ), EMIF preclinical-AD study (Demuru et al, 2017 ), and from the American Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study (Mueller et al, 2005 ) (Supplemental Table 1 ). Supplemental Table 2 shows an overview of the participating centers and the included number of subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%