Diagnostic and Therapeutic Maneuvers for Anterior Canal BPPV Canalithiasis: Three-Dimensional Simulations

BackgroundCanal switch-benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (CS-BPPV) refers to the phenomenon in which otolith particles move from one canal to another (on the ipsilateral side) during or after canalith repositioning procedure (CRP). However, the clinical characteristics of CS-BPPV and the underlying pathological mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the incidence of canal switch (CS) for the different semicircular canals in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), examined nystagmus characteristics, and explored the underlying mechanisms.MethodsClinical data for 1,099 patients with single-canal BPPV were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The incidences of CS in the different types of BPPV were analyzed. Patients were divided into CS-BPPV and non-CS (NCS)-BPPV groups according to whether they exhibited CS after CRP. The baseline characteristics and nystagmus characteristics of patients were compared between the two groups.ResultsPatients with BPPV who developed or did not develop CS accounted for 4.6% (51/1,099) and 95.4% (1,048/1,099), respectively, of the patients included in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, side of the canals involved, hypertension, or diabetes. CS was observed in 3.7% (25/677) of patients with PC-BPPV, including conversion between posterior canal (PC) and horizontal canal (HC) (1.6%, 11/677), and between PC and anterior canal (AC) (2.1%, 14/677). CS was observed in 5.2% (17/327) of patients with HC-BPPV, including from HC to PC (4.3%, 14/327), and from HC to AC (0.9%, 3/327). CS was found in 9.5% (9/95) of patients with AC-BPPV, including from AC to PC (8.4%, 8/95), and from AC to HC (1.1%, 1/95). The intensity of nystagmus was significantly greater in the CS-BPPV group compared with that in the NCS-BPPV group [24.00 (11–39) vs. 12.00 (7–24), P < 0.001]. Furthermore, the incidence of direction-reversing nystagmus was significantly higher in the CS-BPPV group than in the NCS-BPPV group [31.4% (16/51) vs. 4.3% (45/1,048), P < 0.001].ConclusionsCS in BPPV is uncommon. Patients with AC-BPPV are more likely to develop CS, followed by patients with HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV. The occurrence of CS-BPPV may be related to the anatomical structure of the semicircular canals. When the canals contain large/heavy accumulations of otolith particles, CS may be more common during re-examination after CRP.

Section: Cs From Ac To Pcmentioning

confidence: 75%

Canal switch in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: Clinical characteristics and possible mechanisms

Song

Xia

et al. 2022

“…In this case, in the SHHP, the 60-s latency before the onset of a transient burst of UBN with left torsion (lateralized to the involved side) suggested an ipsicanal switch from PC-BPPV-cu-la to PC-BPPV-ca-la, implying left PC involvement ( 14 ). Computer simulations of the Yarcovino maneuver demonstrate a canal switch from AC-BPPV to PC-BPPV ( 39 ). The degree of head extension relative to the earth horizontal in the Yarcovino maneuver and SHHP are similar.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Case report: Atypical patterns of nystagmus suggest posterior canal cupulolithiasis and short-arm canalithiasis

Helminski

2022

BackgroundAtypical posterior canal (PC) positional nystagmus may be due to the changes in cupular response dynamics from cupulolithiasis (cu), canalithiasis of the short arm (ca-sa), or a partial/complete obstruction—jam. Factors that change the dynamics are the position of the head in the pitch plane, individual variability in the location of the PC attachment to the utricle and the position of the cupula within the ampulla, and the location of debris within the short arm and on the cupula. The clinical presentation of PC-BPPV-cu is DBN with torsion towards the contralateral side in the DH positions and SHHP or no nystagmus in the ipsilateral DH position and no nystagmus upon return to sitting from each position. The clinical presentation of PC-BPPV-ca-sa is no nystagmus in the DH position and upbeat nystagmus (UBN) with torsion lateralized to the involved side upon return to sitting from each position.Case descriptionA 68-year-old woman, diagnosed with BPPV, presented with DBN associated with vertigo in both DH positions and without nystagmus or symptoms on sitting up. In the straight head hanging position (SHHP), the findings of a transient burst of UBN with left torsion associated with vertigo suggested ipsicanal conversion from the left PC-BPPV-cu to canalithiasis. Treatment included a modified canalith repositioning procedure (CRP), which resulted in complete resolution. BPPV recurred 17 days later. Clinical presentation of BPPV included no nystagmus/symptoms in both the contralateral DH position and SHHP, DBN in the ipsilateral DH position without symptoms, and UBN with left torsion associated with severe truncal retropulsion and nausea on sitting up from provoking position. The findings suggested the left PC-BPPV-cu-sa and PC-BPPV-ca-sa. Treatment included neck extension, a modified CRP, and demi-Semont before complete resolution.ConclusionAn understanding of the biomechanics of the vestibular system is necessary to differentially diagnose atypical PC-BPPV. DH test (DHT) findings suggest that PC-BPPV-cu presents with DBN or no nystagmus in one or two DH positions and sometimes SHHP and without nystagmus or no reversal/reversal of nystagmus on sitting up. The findings suggest PC-BPPV-ca-sa has no nystagmus in DH positions or DBN in the ipsilateral DH position and UBN with torsion lateralized to the involved side on sitting up.

“…Other tests like the Bow and Lean test ( 7 ) and Upright Roll test ( 8 ) have also been described as diagnostic tests for hc-BPPV. Anterior canal BPPV is diagnosed by the supine head-hanging test with the generation of characteristic downwardly beating nystagmus, which may have a torsional component ( 9 , 10 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modified Interpretations of the Supine Roll Test in Horizontal Canal BPPV Based on Simulations: How the Initial Position of the Debris in the Canal and the Sequence of Testing Affects the Direction of the Nystagmus and the Diagnosis

Bhandari¹,

Bhandari²,

Kingma

et al. 2022

Self Cite

Background and ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to show with three-dimensional simulations how the diagnostic supine roll test (SRT) is affected by the initial position of the debris within the horizontal canal (hc) and study the nystagmus patterns on changing the sequence of testing and its impact on the diagnosis of the side of involvement in hc-BPPV.MethodsA 3D dynamic simulation model was developed and applied based on reconstructed MRI images and fluid dynamics. Each semicircular canal was linked to the respective extraocular muscles to visualize nystagmus generated on stimulation of the canal.ResultsThe simulations of hc-canalithiasis showed that the nystagmus pattern seen with the SRT is changed by the initial position of the otolith debris within the canal and the sequence of testing. The debris changes position during SRT so that sequential steps do not start at the initial position as previously assumed. The sequence of performing the SRT steps from the right or left side influences the nystagmus pattern generated: bilateral direction-changing, bilateral direction-fixed, and unilateral nystagmus can be seen in different test conditions. The SRT itself may even reposition the debris out of the canal.Conclusions and Clinical ImplicationsSimulations provide a dynamic tool to study the diagnostic SRT in hc-canalithiasis. Starting the SRT from right or left has a major impact on the test outcome (unlike the Dix-Hallpike maneuver). The findings provide a new interpretation for the results of the SRT. The simulations explain the phenomenon of direction-fixed nystagmus as a logical consequence of starting the SRT with the head turned toward the non-affected side in hc-canalithiasis with debris in the ampullary arm. They also show that unilateral nystagmus seen on SRT indicates canalithiasis of the non-ampullary arm of the side opposite to the side of nystagmus. The generation of bilateral direction-changing, bilateral direction-fixed, and unilateral nystagmus can be the cause of misdiagnoses in terms of the affected side and underlying mechanisms. Finally, a recommendation for a standardized protocol for the sequence of positional tests should be established to ensure uniform interpretation of test results.