2014
DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s50156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic and therapeutic utility of neuroimaging in depression: an overview

Abstract: A growing number of studies have used neuroimaging to further our understanding of how brain structure and function are altered in major depression. More recently, these techniques have begun to show promise for the diagnosis and treatment of depression, both as aids to conventional methods and as methods in their own right. In this review, we describe recent neuroimaging findings in the field that might aid diagnosis and improve treatment accuracy. Overall, major depression is associated with numerous structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…73 Compared with the findings in these modalities, the abnormalities reported from DTI voxel-wise analyses seem disproportionally small in distribution. 74 The present results suggest that DKI is capable of demonstrating abnormalities that are not fully depicted in DTI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…73 Compared with the findings in these modalities, the abnormalities reported from DTI voxel-wise analyses seem disproportionally small in distribution. 74 The present results suggest that DKI is capable of demonstrating abnormalities that are not fully depicted in DTI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Neuroimaging (eg, Wise et al195) and genetic markers (Tamatam et al196) are reviewed extensively elsewhere.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of network variation include failure to deactivate the DMN during tasks in both autism ( Spencer et al, 2012 ) and depression ( Grimm et al, 2008 ; Sheline et al, 2009 ); decreased DMN activity and connectivity in AD ( Sorg et al, 2007 ; Sheline and Raichle, 2013 ); antagonistic activity during attention-demanding tasks in schizophrenia ( Whitfield-Gabrieli et al, 2009 ); differences in functional connectivity in both anorexia ( Cowdrey et al, 2014 ) and autism ( Assaf et al, 2010 ) and network inhomogeneity in ADHD ( Uddin et al, 2008 ) and bipolar disorders ( Liu et al, 2013 ). In some disorders such as AD ( Sperling, 2011 ; Koch et al, 2012 ; Balthazar et al, 2014 ), depression ( Li et al, 2013 ; Wise et al, 2014 ), and schizophrenia ( Shen et al, 2014 ), these abnormalities of the DMN are consistent enough to be evaluated for use as diagnostic biomarkers.…”
Section: The Dmn As a Diagnostic Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%