2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic differences and agreement between the original and revised European Working Group (EWGSOP) consensus definition for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of sarcopenia varies between 2% and 4% according to EWGSOP2. It is lower than prevalence of sarcopenia by AWGS algorithm, and it is similar to our study (27,28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The prevalence of sarcopenia varies between 2% and 4% according to EWGSOP2. It is lower than prevalence of sarcopenia by AWGS algorithm, and it is similar to our study (27,28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…One of the most accepted was described by the EWGSOP (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Persons), updated in 2018 (EWGSOP2), considering sarcopenia as a "progressive loss of muscle mass and muscle strength, associated to an increased likelihood of adverse events, such as falls, fractures, physical disability and death" [7]. Several authors investigated the differences in sarcopenia cases, agreeing with EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 and noting substantial discordance and limited overlap of the definitions [11,12]. Nevertheless, the EWGSOP2 is crucial suggestion to evaluate a possible condition of sarcopenia by measuring the muscle strength, muscle mass and physical performance [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge at present there is no normative data for grip strength for the Australian population. Villani [ 47 ] recently compared both EWGSOP criteria in an Australian population. They report a significant discordance between both definitions of sarcopenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%