2016
DOI: 10.1002/ca.22753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic dry bone histology in human paleopathology

Abstract: Paleopathology is the study of trauma and disease as may be observed in ancient (human) remains. In contrast to its central role in current medical practice, microscopy plays a rather modest role in paleopathology. This is at least partially due to the differences between fresh and decomposed (i.e., skeletonized or "dry bone") tissue samples. This review discusses these differences and describes how they affect the histological analysis of paleopathological specimens. First, we provide a summary of some genera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing bone fragility becomes forensically important if a trauma victim is claimed to be predisposed to fractures due to a bone disease or advanced age (Rutty et al, 2013). Certain fragility‐inducing pathological disorders such as rickets or osteomalacia (Teitelbaum, 1980), osteomyelitis (de Boer & Van der Merwe, 2016), metastatic bone disease (Buijs & van der Pluijm, 2009), osseous tumors (Klein & Siegal, 2006), Paget's disease of bone (Meunier, Coindre, Edouard, & Arlot, 1980), osteopetrosis (Semba, Ishigami, Sugihara, & Kitano, 2000), and osteogenesis imperfecta (Rauch, Travers, Parfitt, & Glorieux, 2000) have distinct histological presentations (Stout et al, 2019). Distinguishing between traumatic and accidental fractures is most difficult in the elderly, where fracture risk is high (Collins, 2006; Collins & Presnell, 2007; Dolinak, 2008; Murphy, Waa, Jaffer, Sauter, & Chan, 2013; Rosen et al, 2016; Rosenblatt, Cho, & Durance, 1996).…”
Section: Nonosteonal Cortical Histomorphometry: Proxies Of Aged and Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing bone fragility becomes forensically important if a trauma victim is claimed to be predisposed to fractures due to a bone disease or advanced age (Rutty et al, 2013). Certain fragility‐inducing pathological disorders such as rickets or osteomalacia (Teitelbaum, 1980), osteomyelitis (de Boer & Van der Merwe, 2016), metastatic bone disease (Buijs & van der Pluijm, 2009), osseous tumors (Klein & Siegal, 2006), Paget's disease of bone (Meunier, Coindre, Edouard, & Arlot, 1980), osteopetrosis (Semba, Ishigami, Sugihara, & Kitano, 2000), and osteogenesis imperfecta (Rauch, Travers, Parfitt, & Glorieux, 2000) have distinct histological presentations (Stout et al, 2019). Distinguishing between traumatic and accidental fractures is most difficult in the elderly, where fracture risk is high (Collins, 2006; Collins & Presnell, 2007; Dolinak, 2008; Murphy, Waa, Jaffer, Sauter, & Chan, 2013; Rosen et al, 2016; Rosenblatt, Cho, & Durance, 1996).…”
Section: Nonosteonal Cortical Histomorphometry: Proxies Of Aged and Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in a diseased individual, presence of one illness can decrease immune function increasing risk of coinfection. If the coinfecting organism also involves the skeletal system, bone morphology and pattern of lesion location may reflect neither of the infections adequately for definitive diagnosis (Christensen, Martínez‐Lavín, & Peneda, ; de Boer & Van der Merwe, ). Thus, any estimate in the archaeological record must be considered an underestimate of the true prevalence of brucellosis.…”
Section: Brucellosis and Human Palaeopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the bone tissue types, the outer highly mineralized layer of tissue provides resistance to further taphonomic alterations [ 3 ]. Thus, cortical bone histomorphometry can assist the disciplines offering insights into age-at-death, differentiation between animals and humans, and the identification of pathological conditions [ 4 , 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%