Diagnostic Errors in Initial Misdiagnosis of Foreign Body Aspiration in Children: A Retrospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in China

Abstract

Background: Foreign body aspiration (FBA) in children is a common emergency that can easily be missed, leading to delays in treatment. Few large cohort studies have focused on errors in diagnostic assessment. The main purpose of this study was to analyze factors contributing to the initial misdiagnosis of FBA in children.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 226 children diagnosed with FBA at the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2018 to November 2020. Cases were divided into two groups according to whether or not patients were initially misdiagnosed. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were then compared. The Diagnosis Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy tool was applied to cases with initial misdiagnosis.Results: Of the 226 included children with a final diagnosis of FBA, 153 (67.7%) were boys. Ninety percent of patients were under 3 years old. More than half (61.9%) of the children were referred from primary institutions, and 38.1% visited tertiary hospitals directly. A total of 80 (35.4%) patients were initially misdiagnosed. More than half of misdiagnosed children received an alternative diagnosis of bronchiolitis (51.3%), the most common alternative diagnosis. Test failures (i.e., errors in test ordering, test performance, and clinician processing) were primarily responsible for the majority of initial diagnostic errors (76.3%), followed by failure or delay in eliciting critical case history information (20.0%). Characteristics significantly associated with initial misdiagnosis were: presentation over 24 h (OR 9.2, 95% CI 4.8–17.5), being referred from primary institutions (OR 8.8, 4.1–19.0), no witnessed aspiration crisis (OR 7.8, 3.0–20.3), (4) atypical signs or symptoms (OR 3.2, 1.8–5.7), foreign body not visible on CT (OR 36.2, 2.1–636.8), foreign body located in secondary bronchi (OR 4.8, 1.3–17.2), organic foreign body (OR 6.2, 1.4–27.2), and history of recurrent respiratory infections (OR 2.7, 1.4–5.3). Children with misdiagnosis tended to have a longer time from symptom onset to the definitive diagnosis of FBA (P < 0.001).Conclusions: More than one-third of children with FBA were missed at first presentation. Errors in diagnostic testing and history taking were the main reasons leading to initial misdiagnosis.

A sunflower seed foreign body aspiration misdiagnosed as pneumonia in a child after tetralogy of Fallot operation: A case report

“…The primary cause is test errors, followed by failure or delay in eliciting critical history information. 11 In this case, our patient suffered from coughing, wheezing, and shortness of breath. His chest X-ray indicated no specific lesions.…”

“…The primary cause is test errors, followed by failure or delay in eliciting critical history information. 11 …”

“…In a study in China, 35.4% of children with a foreign body in the airway were misdiagnosed, mainly mistaken for bronchiolitis. The primary cause is test errors, followed by failure or delay in eliciting critical history information 11 …”

Using Machine Learning Technique to Predict the Most Reliable Diagnostic Finding for Foreign Body Aspiration in Children: Symptoms, Chest X-ray, or Auscultation?

“…A study by Zhu et al reported that FBAs were misdiagnosed at a rate of 35.6% in healthcare institutions other than tertiary care centers [ 12 ]. They showed that the most common misdiagnosis was bronchiolitis (51.3%) [ 12 ].…”

“…A study by Zhu et al reported that FBAs were misdiagnosed at a rate of 35.6% in healthcare institutions other than tertiary care centers [ 12 ]. They showed that the most common misdiagnosis was bronchiolitis (51.3%) [ 12 ]. Keeping this in mind, we aimed to achieve more accurate results by scanning previous patient records and trying different models to prevent the physician who first saw the patient from making a wrong diagnosis.…”