2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0187-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic imaging of pediatric hematogenous osteomyelitis: lessons learned from a multi-modality approach

Abstract: Pediatric hematogenous osteomyelitis may present highly variable radiological expression, which is influenced by the age and condition of the patient, the virulence of the causative agent, the stage of the disease, or the selected imaging tool. Given the multiplicity of available modalities and the multi-faceted nature of the process, purposeful imaging of pediatric hematogenous osteomyelitis may be difficult. In order to avoid diagnostic delays and complications, familiarity with the variable expression of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The palaeopathological identification of AO in children's remains may benefit if all the bones showing new bone formation are radiographed. The radiograph should reveal first subperiosteal resorption, ‘creating radiolucencies with cortical bone that then may progress to irregular destruction with periosteal new bone formation’ (Blickman et al ., :L57; also see Capitanio & Kirkpatrick, ; Mellado Santos, ). However, as Resnick & Kransdorf () pointed out, radiological diagnosis of AO is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The palaeopathological identification of AO in children's remains may benefit if all the bones showing new bone formation are radiographed. The radiograph should reveal first subperiosteal resorption, ‘creating radiolucencies with cortical bone that then may progress to irregular destruction with periosteal new bone formation’ (Blickman et al ., :L57; also see Capitanio & Kirkpatrick, ; Mellado Santos, ). However, as Resnick & Kransdorf () pointed out, radiological diagnosis of AO is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to clinical evidence, classic bone destruction and periosteal bone formation are not seen in plain radiographs until 10–12 days after the onset of symptoms (Blickman et al ., ; Pineda et al ., ), although early subtle changes may be not obvious within 5 to 7 days in children (Pineda et al ., ). Moreover, in subacute osteomyelitis, diagnosed 2 weeks after the onset of symptoms (Harik & Smeltzer, ), abscesses typically involve the medullary cavity, and lytic areas surrounded by reactive sclerosis are usually present in plain radiographs (Mellado Santos, ). No bone remodelling or radiological signs compatible with osteomyelitis were found in skeleton 278.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI is a sensitive method for osteomyelitis detection. A low signal intensity is seen in the bone marrow on T1-weighted sequences and fluid and inflammatory cell infiltration results in high signal intensity on T2-weighted and other fluid sensitive MRI sequences [3] , [11] , [12] . Fat saturation sequences are useful to differentiate bone marrow edema from the fatty tissue of bone marrow and subcutaneous tissue [10] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T2 fat-suppressed, or short-tau inversion-recovery (STIR) images are particularly helpful in detecting extensive signal changes which are a combination of infected bone marrow and surrounding reactive oedema. Additionally, MRI can also detect soft tissue inflammatory changes and help to differentiate phlegmon from abscess formation [ 10 ] ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Acute Bacterial Osteomyelitismentioning
confidence: 99%