1953
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1953.00240180067008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Importance of Café-Au-Lait Spot in Neurofibromatosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30], in our patients CLS were found in highest frequency reported in the literature. Moreover, the prevalence of multiple C'LS was also remarkably high: 0.8% of the 939 patients exhibited more than 3 spots (a fact reported by Crowe [16) Although 6 CLS are considered to be significant for the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis, none of our 3 patients exhibiting such a number of CLS had other overt stigmata of diseases that have been reported to be associated with increased prevalence of these spots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…30], in our patients CLS were found in highest frequency reported in the literature. Moreover, the prevalence of multiple C'LS was also remarkably high: 0.8% of the 939 patients exhibited more than 3 spots (a fact reported by Crowe [16) Although 6 CLS are considered to be significant for the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis, none of our 3 patients exhibiting such a number of CLS had other overt stigmata of diseases that have been reported to be associated with increased prevalence of these spots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In this series, 15 (2.5%) were found to have such lesions. In addition, 14 (2.3%) had nevi spili and 83 (13.8%) had caf\l=e'\au lait spots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Crowe and Schull (1953) found that one cafe-au-lait patch of more than 1-5 cm in diameter was present in 8 to 9 % of a mental hospital population, and two cafe-au-lait patches were present in 1 %. Fifty-three patients with tuberous sclerosis were included in their control group and did not differ from the main group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%