2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38709-8_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Information for Compliance Checking of Temporal Compliance Requirements

Abstract: Abstract. Compliance checking is gaining importance as today's organizations need to show that operational processes are executed in a controlled manner while satisfying predefined (legal) requirements or service level agreements. Deviations may be costly and expose an organization to severe risks. Compliance checking is of growing importance for the business process management and auditing communities. This paper presents an approach for checking compliance of observed process executions recorded in an event … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the identification of suitable compliance rule language that can support all multiple process perspectives i.e., support control flow, data, resource, time, and interactions with process partners remain important. Several approaches for the formal specification of compliance rules have been identified in literature using languages such as the FCL (Formal Contract Language), LTL (Linear Temporal Logic), CTL (Computation Tree Logic) or other text based languages, but since these formal languages are complex and error-prone, some researchers like [8,9,10,11] suggested the idea of specifying compliance rule using visual notation such as BPSL [13],…”
Section: Compliance Rule Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the identification of suitable compliance rule language that can support all multiple process perspectives i.e., support control flow, data, resource, time, and interactions with process partners remain important. Several approaches for the formal specification of compliance rules have been identified in literature using languages such as the FCL (Formal Contract Language), LTL (Linear Temporal Logic), CTL (Computation Tree Logic) or other text based languages, but since these formal languages are complex and error-prone, some researchers like [8,9,10,11] suggested the idea of specifying compliance rule using visual notation such as BPSL [13],…”
Section: Compliance Rule Languagementioning
confidence: 99%