1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(98)90226-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic injection around the shoulder: Hit and miss? A cadaveric study of injection accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
2
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
65
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Unfortunately, AC joint injections can be challenging and up to one-third of injections have been shown to be outside the joint. 17 I did not perform radiographic guidance of our injection site. Instead, local anaesthetic was injected and its anaesthetic effect was measured using the previously described protocol of clinical testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Unfortunately, AC joint injections can be challenging and up to one-third of injections have been shown to be outside the joint. 17 I did not perform radiographic guidance of our injection site. Instead, local anaesthetic was injected and its anaesthetic effect was measured using the previously described protocol of clinical testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important concern in our study was the use of ultrasound to guide the subacromial injection from the anterolateral approach. Partington and Broome (26) found that, although injection into the subacromial space through an anterolateral approach ' was successful in more than 80% of cadaveric specimens in the absence of ultrasound guidance, 75% of the successful injections also infiltrated other regional structures, including the rotator cuff and deltoid. Both Chen et al (27) and Tagliafico et al (28) stated that greater accuracy was obtained when ultrasoundguided injections were used, as compared with blind injection.…”
Section: 'C>-t----------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,9,[12][13][14]46 One reason for such differences possibly can be related to variability in the accuracy of injected corticosteroid placement. For example, the success rate of blinded subacromial injection varied greatly from 29% to 83% depending on injection methods and operators, [47][48][49][50] with better treatment effect from corticosteroids more accurately injected into the subacromial bursa. 9,15,51 With recent advances in diagnostic ultrasound in musculoskeletal medicine, ultrasound-guided injections have become prevalent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%