2020
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic options for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jeopardizing the diagnostic accuracy by some pre-analytical and analytical variables. (Xiao et al, 2020).…”
Section: Definitive Diagnosis Of Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Jeopardizing the diagnostic accuracy by some pre-analytical and analytical variables. (Xiao et al, 2020).…”
Section: Definitive Diagnosis Of Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology shows higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR. It can be used in various aspects of virus detection, including double-check detection, secondary diagnosis, and suspected sample detection to be RT-PCR false-negative (Xiao et al, 2020).…”
Section: Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the World Health Organization [1], the novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which is of the same family as SARS-CoV-1, which caused the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003, all isolated from bats [2, 3,4]. These viruses come from the virus family 'Coronaviradae' recognized in 1968 and named as such because their viral structure and intracellular budding sites differentiated them from other RNA viruses [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%