2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0472-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic performance of isolated-check visual evoked potential versus retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer analysis in early primary open-angle glaucoma

Abstract: BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of isolated-check visual evoked potential (icVEP) with that of retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCILP) analysis using optical coherence tomography (OCT).MethodsA total of 45 patients were enrolled: 25 patients with open-angle glaucoma and 20 healthy patients. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination. Moreover, the OCT examination was used to analyze the structures of the GCIPL. The icVEP technique wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen and Zhao also reported that the sensitivity of the icVEP in 15% positive contrast and 10 Hz temporal modulation was 80% and the specificity was 90% for diagnosing early POAG, but they defined GON as a cup-disc ratio ≥0.6 or vertical cup/disc diameter ratio asymmetry ≥0.2 and did not analyze the MD of the visual field test. [ 20 ] With different GON criterion, the sensitivity of the icVEP was 62.5% and the specificity was 92.3% for diagnosing early POAG in the current study, which might be due to the smaller MD of the visual field test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen and Zhao also reported that the sensitivity of the icVEP in 15% positive contrast and 10 Hz temporal modulation was 80% and the specificity was 90% for diagnosing early POAG, but they defined GON as a cup-disc ratio ≥0.6 or vertical cup/disc diameter ratio asymmetry ≥0.2 and did not analyze the MD of the visual field test. [ 20 ] With different GON criterion, the sensitivity of the icVEP was 62.5% and the specificity was 92.3% for diagnosing early POAG in the current study, which might be due to the smaller MD of the visual field test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Recent studies demonstrated that the accuracy of the icVEP for diagnosing glaucoma is high, ranging from 91% to 100%,[ 8 17 ] especially for early glaucoma in Asians with a sensitivity of 53.1–82.2% and a specificity of 57.6–90%. [ 19 20 21 ] Age and sex differences in samples between patients and healthy controls existed in these studies, however, and none of these studies evaluated the diagnostic value of the icVEP in only patients diagnosed with early stage of OAG, comprising both primary OAG (POAG) and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). Therefore, we performed this cross-sectional study in China to further evaluate the potential diagnostic value of the icVEP in patients with early-stage POAG and NTG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrodes impedance was maintained below 5 kOhm. Flash-PEV stimulation is less sensitive than the pattern examination to the visual system dysfunction, and is mainly reserved for young, non-cooperating patients with media opacities or large refractive errors that cannot collaborate for pattern-PEV [ 11 ]. After the flash stimulation, the amplitude and latency of the resulting P2 wave were also analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VEP and the OCT are powerful methods for glaucoma diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of these methods are similar in detecting early damage [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical treatment mainly aims to reduce intraocular pressure and maintain the normal range of intraocular pressure, main treatments include laser, drugs, surgery and other methods ( 1 ). Basic study confirmed that ( 2 ) retinal ganglion cell (RGC) apoptosis and optic nerve axon degeneration caused by ischemia, oxidative stress and inflammatory response are important causes of the occurrence and development of glaucoma. Malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) are the most commonly used biochemical markers for the evaluation of glaucoma animal model and glaucoma patients with oxidative stress disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%