2021
DOI: 10.1177/02841851211065925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic performance of MRI and endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review of the literature

Abstract: Background The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities and/or endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is unclear. Purpose To summarize existing evidence on the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, T2-weighted MR tumor regression grade, and/or endoscopy for assessing complete tumor response after nCRT. Material and Methods MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched. The PRISMA guideli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the aim of avoiding the risks and long-term sequelae of surgery, watch-and-wait strategy was suggested for patients with complete clinical response after neo-adjuvant treatment [ 2 , 23 ]. However, 15.7% of patients managed with this approach have local regrowth within two years [ 23 ], likely because imaging overestimates tumor regression [ 24 ]. Therefore, other markers, with a higher accuracy in predicting complete pathological response, are needed to more appropriately identify patients who could be spared surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aim of avoiding the risks and long-term sequelae of surgery, watch-and-wait strategy was suggested for patients with complete clinical response after neo-adjuvant treatment [ 2 , 23 ]. However, 15.7% of patients managed with this approach have local regrowth within two years [ 23 ], likely because imaging overestimates tumor regression [ 24 ]. Therefore, other markers, with a higher accuracy in predicting complete pathological response, are needed to more appropriately identify patients who could be spared surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the evaluation of prognosis indexes, as well as the response assessment of the neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy (C-RT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) [ 7 ], still represents a challenge [ 10 ], although these topics could be exciting to customize the therapy to the patient needs [ 11 ]. Several works in the last few decades suggest the feasibility of a wait-and-see approach in patients with very high surgical risk or trans-anal rectal excision approach if a significant response to CRT is assessed [ 1 , 10 , 12 , 13 ]. In this regard, magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) seems to be helpful to provide morphological and functional pieces of information that can be used to predict prognosis in pre-treatment patients [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], but its value in the pre- and post-CRT response assessment is still debated [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%