2017
DOI: 10.1177/1971400916689484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic performance of reformatted isotropic thin-section helical CT images in the detection of superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this article is to assess the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) reformatted images for detection of superior semicircular canal (SSC) dehiscence. Material and methods Forty-two patients, with sound- and/or pressure-induced vestibular symptoms, and 42 control participants underwent helical CT examination with a highly collimated beam (0.5 mm). Reformatted images of the vestibular labyrinth were obtained in the standard axial and coronal planes (group A images), and in a p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, multidetector CT (MDCT) is the mainstay of the diagnosis of a semicircular canal dehiscence. The accuracy in the detection of SSCD in one study was between 92.9% utilizing standard axial and coronal planes and 98.8% using planes parallel and perpendicular to the SSC, similar to the technique and imaging planes as used in this study (20). However, Sequeira et al (21) caution that MDCT tends to overestimate the prevalence of SSCD in comparison with higher resolution CT techniques such as microCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Currently, multidetector CT (MDCT) is the mainstay of the diagnosis of a semicircular canal dehiscence. The accuracy in the detection of SSCD in one study was between 92.9% utilizing standard axial and coronal planes and 98.8% using planes parallel and perpendicular to the SSC, similar to the technique and imaging planes as used in this study (20). However, Sequeira et al (21) caution that MDCT tends to overestimate the prevalence of SSCD in comparison with higher resolution CT techniques such as microCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…These scans were obtained in the axial plane with a 128-row CT scanner (Somatom Definition AS, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and a 0.8mm slice thickness. Reformatted images were then obtained from a volumetric isotropic dataset by using a dedicated workstation (Philips, Best, Netherlands) [ 6 ]. Standard axial, coronal and sagittal images were reconstructed at 0.1mm increments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%