2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/7754329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Performance of Three ELISAs for Detection of Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Human Samples

Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a disease with a high rate of transmission. Serological tests are important to perform surveys and to determine the immunological status of the population. Based on this, we evaluated three enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs) using different antigens from SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of 161 patients. The performance of the ELISA developed for immunoglobulin G (IgG) measurement against SARS-CoV-2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For IgG detection, sensitivity ranged from 76.31-94.7%, while IgM detection displayed more variability, ranging from 47.0-81.6%. However, all studies consistently achieved high specificities above 95% [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] . In one study, immunoassay accuracy using RBD for IgG detection reached 94.0%, surpassing our study's results [29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For IgG detection, sensitivity ranged from 76.31-94.7%, while IgM detection displayed more variability, ranging from 47.0-81.6%. However, all studies consistently achieved high specificities above 95% [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] . In one study, immunoassay accuracy using RBD for IgG detection reached 94.0%, surpassing our study's results [29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, all studies consistently achieved high specificities above 95% [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] . In one study, immunoassay accuracy using RBD for IgG detection reached 94.0%, surpassing our study's results [29] . Commercial RBD-based tests, including VIDAS SARS-COV-2 RBD IgG (BioMérieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France), Siemens SARS-CoV-2 RBD Total (COV2T) (Siemens, NY, USA), and the Access SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG assay (Beckman-Coulter, CA, USA), reported specificities of 99.9%, 99.8%, and 99.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The ELISA for total IgG against the Spike protein followed the previously published protocol [ 25 ]. Serum samples from all participants were collected before vaccination, 30 days after receiving the first dose, and 30 days after the second dose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%