2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08269-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound attenuation imaging for assessing low-grade hepatic steatosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic performance of ATI in a pediatric population in this study was comparable to the values reported in adult populations [ 15 , 16 , 27 , 28 ]. A previous study that included 48 pediatric patients also showed that AC had good diagnostic performance in comparison with a reference standard of MRI-PDFF, with a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.98 using an AC threshold of 0.60 dB/cm/MHz [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The diagnostic performance of ATI in a pediatric population in this study was comparable to the values reported in adult populations [ 15 , 16 , 27 , 28 ]. A previous study that included 48 pediatric patients also showed that AC had good diagnostic performance in comparison with a reference standard of MRI-PDFF, with a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.98 using an AC threshold of 0.60 dB/cm/MHz [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…grayscale US image, has shown acceptable accuracy in the detection of fatty liver in adult populations [14][15][16]. As ATI enables hepatic fat quantification during a single-sitting US examination, it has a potential role in pediatric populations.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D a R T I C L Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the review by Lewis et al and several subsequently published papers, there are in total 14 studies that have assessed the accuracy of ATI in the quantification of HS compared with the reference methods, as well as their determined cut-offs and AUROC values, which are presented in Table 4 [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ]. Several authors have compared ATI with the CAP, but due to its suboptimal performance in quantifying the liver fat content, the latest WFUMB guidelines recommend against using the CAP as the reference standard [ 3 ].…”
Section: Quantitative Ultrasound-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATI calculates the percentage of returned ultrasound energy not absorbed by liver tissue to determine the attenuation by organ tissue. Studies on ATI measurements of liver parenchyma in adults indicate its ability to detect and quantify steatosis and to differentiate between mild, moderate, and severe grades (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Furthermore, ATI correlates with the results of MRI-PDFF (magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction) and histopathology representing the gold standard for fat measurement in liver parenchyma (22,26,28,29) and with grayscale grading (30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%