2008
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic pitfalls in fine needle aspiration biopsy of the spleen

Abstract: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the spleen is rarely performed, due to fear of procedure complications. The objective of this study is to review the cytologic diagnoses of aspiration biopsy of the spleen performed in a cancer center. Archival material (9-year period) was reviewed and correlated with histologic and ancillary test results, when available.Forty-one splenic FNA specimens were identified. There were no reported procedure complications. Nineteen cases were diagnosed as malignant. Of these, 11 were l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several more recent publications have reported much lower complication rates with smaller needle diameters (18 gauge or smaller) ( 5,6,16 ). Diseases that commonly affect the spleen can pose a diagnostic challenge to the clinician, radiologist, and pathologist, and the reported diagnostic accuracy of splenic biopsy varies, ranging between 84% and 90% ( 5,14,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several more recent publications have reported much lower complication rates with smaller needle diameters (18 gauge or smaller) ( 5,6,16 ). Diseases that commonly affect the spleen can pose a diagnostic challenge to the clinician, radiologist, and pathologist, and the reported diagnostic accuracy of splenic biopsy varies, ranging between 84% and 90% ( 5,14,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has the reputation of being a dangerous intervention and the specimen obtained is usually thought to be unduly difficult to assess, but these prejudicial ideas are fundamentally wrong. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] FNAC is a safe, easy, simple, reproducible and rapid diagnostic procedure and has distinct advantage over open true cut or core biopsy. As it requires no special instrument and incur no significant trauma and cost to the patient Although radiological modalities like ultrasound, CT scan, or MRI usually narrow down the differential diagnosis but rarely provide a definitive picture and tissue sample in form of an aspirate or a biopsy is required to clinch a specific diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Splenic pathology can be localised or secondary to systemic involvement in various diseases. The indications of splenic FNAC [3][4][5]8,16 are non-neoplastic diseases like infectious diseases, storage disorder, sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, hemophagocytic syndrome and neoplastic conditions like different haematological and metastatic epithelial tumours. In this present retrospective study, we have explored the role of FNAC in splenic lesion in a multidisciplinary tertiary health care centre.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Percutaneous US-guided FNA has been considered an effective and less invasive alternative to surgical splenectomy for the diagnosis of lymphoma [66,67,68]. However, the use of this diagnostic technique remains controversial.…”
Section: Fna Diagnosis Of Specific Organ-based Primary Deep-seated Lymentioning
confidence: 99%