This study aimed to evaluate the effect of equalization filters (EFs) on the kerma-area product (KAP KM Q ) and incident air-kerma (K KM a,i,Q ) using a kermaarea product (KAP) meter. In addition, potential underestimations of the K KM a,i,Q values by EFs were identified. Materials and methods: A portable flat-panel detector (FPD) was placed to measure the X-ray beam area (A) and EFs dimension at patient entrance reference point (PERP). Afterward, a 6-cm 3 external ionization chamber was placed to measure incident air-kerma (K ext a,i,Q ) at PERP instead of the portable FPD. KAP reading and K ext a,i,Q were simultaneously measured at several X-ray beam qualities with and without EFs. The X-ray beam quality correction factor by KAP meter (k KM Q,Q 0 ) was calculated by A, K ext a,i,Q and KAP reading to acquire the KAP KM Q and K KM a,i,Q .Upon completion of the measurements,KAP KM Q ,K KM a,i,Q ,and K ext a,i,Q were plotted as functions of tube potential, spectral filter, and EFs dimension. Moreover, K KM a,i,Q ∕K ext a,i,Q values were calculated to evaluate the K KM a,i,Q underestimation. Results: The k KM Q,Q 0 values increased with an increase in the X-ray tube potential and spectral filter, and the maximum k KM Q,Q 0 was 1.18. KAP KM Q and K KM a,i,Q decreased as functions of EFs dimension, whereas K ext a,i,Q was almost constant. K KM a,i,Q ∕K ext a,i,Q decreased with an increase in EFs dimension but increased with an increase in tube potential and spectral filter, and the range was 0.55-1.01. Conclusions: K KM a,i,Q value was up to approximately two times lower than the K ext a,i,Q values by EFs. When using the K KM a,i,Q value, the potential K KM a,i,Q underestimation with EFs should be considered.