2009
DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Spirometry in Primary Care: Proposed standards for general practice compliant with American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society recommendations. A General Practice Airways Group (GPIAG)1 document, in association with the Association for Respiratory Technology & Physiology (ARTP)2 and Education for Health3 1www.gpiag.org 2 www.artp.org 3 www.educationforhealth.org.uk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
111
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Their handling was simple and they were considered low maintenance. However, the choice of reference values in the menu and the clicking of participants' information were difficult, and absence of a real-time display of spirometric curves (which has recently been recommended 31 ) may have generated a higher number of invalid spirometry readings. Fieldworkers passed a quality control test, but the yield of valid spirometry readings (67.3%) was medium to low compared to that found in similar studies.…”
Section: • Database and Document Repositorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their handling was simple and they were considered low maintenance. However, the choice of reference values in the menu and the clicking of participants' information were difficult, and absence of a real-time display of spirometric curves (which has recently been recommended 31 ) may have generated a higher number of invalid spirometry readings. Fieldworkers passed a quality control test, but the yield of valid spirometry readings (67.3%) was medium to low compared to that found in similar studies.…”
Section: • Database and Document Repositorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines published in 2005, and the more recent recommendations on spirometry in the primary-care setting, have largely reiterated that stand. 5,6 However, several old and recent international initiatives, mostly focusing on COPD, still recommend the use of a fixed percentage for this purpose. [7][8][9] The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, first published in 2001 and thereafter updated annually, define COPD as a post-bronchodilator FEV 1 /FVC below 0.70.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis is based on the history, signs and symptoms, 33,34 and whilst the presence of atopy may strengthen the probability of asthma, diagnostic spirometry is not practical under the age of 5 years. 35 The IPCRG guidelines suggest a range of symptom-based tools and investigations including peak flow monitoring, spirometry, reversibility testing and challenge tests, 36 and a recent international statement summarises the technical details. 37 Information on the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of such tools in primary care settings is needed to inform best practice.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[143][144][145][146][147][148] This fixed ratio cutoff has the advantage of simplicity but does not allow for the natural reduction in the ratio due to lung ageing, thus risking under-diagnosis in younger patients and over-diagnosis in the elderly. 35 The use of the lower limit of normal (LLN) may improve diagnostic precision but accurate reference ranges are needed in the older patients. 155 Primary care spirometry has been criticised as being underused, 156,157 and in many countries is not available outside specialist centres.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Copd In Primary Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation