1995
DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)23623-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic tests for H. pylori: A prospective evaluation of their accuracy with an independent “gold standard”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
154
3
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
154
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…35 The 13 carbon-urea breath test presented a high occurrence of false results: 4 false positive and 2 false negative results. Despite the high sensitivity and specificity described for the method, 26,27,39 our results (sensitivity = 93.1% and specificity = 78.9%) were lower than observed in other studies, especially by Thijs et al, 27 who observed 100% sensitivity and specificity in a similar study among adults. The sensitivity, moreover, presents results closer to those described by Vandenplas et al, 26 who evaluated pediatric patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 The 13 carbon-urea breath test presented a high occurrence of false results: 4 false positive and 2 false negative results. Despite the high sensitivity and specificity described for the method, 26,27,39 our results (sensitivity = 93.1% and specificity = 78.9%) were lower than observed in other studies, especially by Thijs et al, 27 who observed 100% sensitivity and specificity in a similar study among adults. The sensitivity, moreover, presents results closer to those described by Vandenplas et al, 26 who evaluated pediatric patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…33 This lower concordance is due to the occurrence of a high number of false results, as observed in Table 1: fifteen patients (32%) presented one discordant result, with this result being positive in 7 (patients 11-17) and negative in 8 (patients [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], which suggest these results may be false. But when more than one method presents discordance it is necessary to analyze carefully the methods and criteria used to classify the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six commonly used tests to detect H. pylori are the histological examination, microbial culture, poly-merase chain reaction, rapid urease test, serology (ELISA) and 13C-urea breath test. 6 The histopathologic detection is still considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of H. pylori. 7 Use of more than one diagnostic method improves H. pylori detection rate.…”
Section: Ar Khan An Age-and Gender-specific Analysis Of H Pylori Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many ways of testing: serology, 13 C-urea breath test and faecal antigen test. Compared with histology, it is estimated that the 13 C-urea breath test is 95% sensitive and 95% specific when diagnosing H. pylori infections [63]. Elwyn et al [64] performed a cost effectiveness analysis and concluded that serology is less accurate than the 13 C-urea breath test and the faecal antigen test, because it is not able to distinguish between present and past infections.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Drug Treatment Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%