2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic ultrasound in patients with shoulder pain: An inter-examiner agreement and reliability study among Dutch physical therapists

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Images were acquired with a Vinno G60 (Vinno technology Co., Ltd.; Suzhou, China) US equipment with a 7.3–14 MHz linear probe. Ultrasound imaging is considered a reliable and valid tool for assessing the shoulder since its consistency with magnetic resonance imaging is 71.6%, 95.5%, 83.6%, and 80.6% for supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis tendons, and long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT), respectively [ 18 , 19 ]. The imaging acquisition procedure was conducted by a single examiner with 5 years of experience following the international standardized guidelines of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were acquired with a Vinno G60 (Vinno technology Co., Ltd.; Suzhou, China) US equipment with a 7.3–14 MHz linear probe. Ultrasound imaging is considered a reliable and valid tool for assessing the shoulder since its consistency with magnetic resonance imaging is 71.6%, 95.5%, 83.6%, and 80.6% for supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis tendons, and long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT), respectively [ 18 , 19 ]. The imaging acquisition procedure was conducted by a single examiner with 5 years of experience following the international standardized guidelines of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%