2015
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss

Abstract: Objectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
64
1
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
64
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…VOUS were obtained in 2.8% of our cases, which is consistent with the frequency reported in other studies (6,7,14). However, we checked all the reference genes involved in these VOUS and none of them are known to play a key role in embryonic development or to be associated with fetal death.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VOUS were obtained in 2.8% of our cases, which is consistent with the frequency reported in other studies (6,7,14). However, we checked all the reference genes involved in these VOUS and none of them are known to play a key role in embryonic development or to be associated with fetal death.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although attempts have been made over many years to identify human lethal CNVs, so far, little is known about the association between a specific CNV and miscarriage. The prevalence of the 22q11.2 microdeletion was 0.19% (1/535), which is consistent with the frequency reported in previous studies on miscarriage (0.05-0.8%) (6,13,14), and notably higher than the incidence of 22q11.2 microdeletion in the general population (0.013% of live births) (24). We identified submicroscopic pathogenic genomic imbalances in 2.2% (12/535) of our cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…[1,2] It is estimated that chromosomal abnormalities, in the majority of cases aneuploidies, account for 50–70% of miscarriages of less than 10 week’ gestation in the general reproductive population [39]. In the presence of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), it is important to distinguish between parental genetic abnormalities and embryo chromosomal abnormalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miscarried embryo chromosomal abnormalities are mostly de novo in origin. Nevertheless, in specific cases, chromosomal characterization of miscarriage tissues can identify familial chromosomal rearrangements that may predispose couples to RPL [1]. Even in those cases of de novo chromosomal abnormalities, being aware of such information may provide couples with an explanation for the loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation