1986
DOI: 10.1080/87565648609540335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic utility of the critical level formula and clinical summary scales of the luria‐nebraska Neuropsychological Battery‐Children's Revision with learning‐disabled children

Abstract: Maisch (1986) Diagnostic utility of the critical level formula and clinical summary scales of the luria-nebraska Neuropsychological Battery-Children's Revision with learning-disabled children, Developmental Neuropsychology, 2:2, 125-135,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the studies in Table 1 with LD populations, many of which included CHI children, showed the Pathognomonic scale of the LNNB-C to be the best group discriminator (Hale & Foltz, 1982;Teeter, Boliek, Obrzut, & Malsch, 1986) and further demonstrated the LNNB-C subscales to be sensitive to VIQ weaknesses on the WISC-R (Gilger & Geary, 1985). When using the LNNB-C to discriminate brain-damaged children from normal children the Pathognomonic and the Left and Right Sensorimotor scales have been most effective (Sawicki, Leark, Golden, & Karras, 1984).…”
Section: CDmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the studies in Table 1 with LD populations, many of which included CHI children, showed the Pathognomonic scale of the LNNB-C to be the best group discriminator (Hale & Foltz, 1982;Teeter, Boliek, Obrzut, & Malsch, 1986) and further demonstrated the LNNB-C subscales to be sensitive to VIQ weaknesses on the WISC-R (Gilger & Geary, 1985). When using the LNNB-C to discriminate brain-damaged children from normal children the Pathognomonic and the Left and Right Sensorimotor scales have been most effective (Sawicki, Leark, Golden, & Karras, 1984).…”
Section: CDmentioning
confidence: 99%