2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2010.00337.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic utility of the Key Search Test as a measure of executive functions

Abstract: Background: Executive function deficits are commonly observed in many clinical populations, highlighting the importance of appropriate diagnostic tools to screen for these deficits. Most neuropsychological tests of executive function, however, are time-consuming and difficult to administer in the case of moderate to severe cognitive decline. The aim of the present study was to examine whether the Key Search Test, a short and easy to administer test, is a useful indicator of executive function deficits in a stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, fMRI studies of other visual-spatial planning task tests (Tower of London, Tower of Hanoi) show prefrontal cortex activity (the right ventrolateral and leftrostrolateral) which Amanzio et al [59] hypothesize as involving a similar neural network. The "key search" task of the BADS test reached a "medium" correlation with the "Rey Complex Figure", another executive function test measuring planning and organizational capacity [61,62]. AR actually improved his score on the Rey Complex test by 9.2% (2014-2015) after 2 years on intranasal insulin, showed no deterioration in Digit Span and WORLD executive-functioning tests (2014-2015) [5].…”
Section: Pragmatic Competence Inferential Reasoning and Executive Fumentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, fMRI studies of other visual-spatial planning task tests (Tower of London, Tower of Hanoi) show prefrontal cortex activity (the right ventrolateral and leftrostrolateral) which Amanzio et al [59] hypothesize as involving a similar neural network. The "key search" task of the BADS test reached a "medium" correlation with the "Rey Complex Figure", another executive function test measuring planning and organizational capacity [61,62]. AR actually improved his score on the Rey Complex test by 9.2% (2014-2015) after 2 years on intranasal insulin, showed no deterioration in Digit Span and WORLD executive-functioning tests (2014-2015) [5].…”
Section: Pragmatic Competence Inferential Reasoning and Executive Fumentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Amanzio et al [59] found novel metaphor comprehension in AD was predicted by the "key search" task of the Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) test which explores planning in the visual-spatial domain. The BADS "key search" task test has been found to be an accurate, general discriminator of executive functioning impairment versus non-impairment despite problems in further differentiating levels of executive impairment in MCI & AD patients [61]. There is no functional neuroimaging study of the neural correlates of the specific tasks.…”
Section: Pragmatic Competence Inferential Reasoning and Executive Fumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinical setting, depression in the elderly needs to be differentially diagnosis from neurodegenerative diseases causing dementia, 3 including Alzheimer's disease, 4 diffuse Lewy body disease, 5 frontotemporal dementia, 6 and Parkinson's disease 7 , but this is sometimes difficult, even with neuropsychological, 8,9 biochemical, 10–12 electrophysiological, 13,14 or brain imaging examinations 15–18 . For dementia patients with depression, effective pharmacological 4 and non‐pharmacological 19–22 interventions are sometimes required to control agitation, irritation, negativism, and violent and suicidal behaviors 11 …”
Section: Comorbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, one point of consideration concerns the low internal consistency of the executive function domain score, because of which it was decided to use the separate executive function tests instead. Many previous studies also reported small to moderate correlations between executive function tests [45–48], which is inherently due to the heterogeneous nature of executive function. The use of separate test scores may actually be the reason for not finding a relationship with pain, because composite scores increase the signal‐to‐noise ratio [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%