BackgroundAnemia, particularly due to low hemoglobin levels, is a significant public health concern in India. Traditional invasive screening methods can be burdensome and may limit access to diagnosis. This study evaluated the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a noninvasive hemoglobin screening device called EzeCheck for determining hemoglobin levels across diverse populations in India. We aimed to assess the user feasibility of the EzeCheck device and to conduct a comparative analysis of its cost-effectiveness against other available invasive and noninvasive methods to determine hemoglobin levels.
MethodsThis study adopted a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data for analysis. User feedback was collected through surveys and interviews with healthcare professionals and workers across various regions. A cost-effectiveness analysis compared the EzeCheck device with other available noninvasive devices and standard invasive methods, accounting for factors such as equipment costs, consumables requirements, time efficiency, and overall testing costs.
ResultsPreliminary findings suggest that the EzeCheck device was well-received by users, with 198 (86%) healthcare professionals reporting improved workflow and patient satisfaction. The comparative analysis revealed that the EzeCheck device was the most affordable option in terms of overall screening costs, while also increasing screening efficiency to a great extent. Moreover, it provided a safer and more comfortable experience for patients and users.
ConclusionsThe noninvasive EzeCheck hemoglobin screening device demonstrates superior feasibility and costeffectiveness over traditional methods. This study highlights its potential for enhancing anemia detection in India, particularly in underserved areas. By improving accessibility and reducing costs, this device could significantly impact public health outcomes and inform future health policy initiatives.